Mark data volumes as optional#79
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for opening this pull request! Be sure to follow the pull request template!
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
what benefit does this change provide? while the data path(s) may be optional technically, the container needs a path for what to sync. Im not seeing a reason for this change |
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Description:
My understanding is that the two
datavolumes are optional. Thus, I've moved them toopt_param_volumes.(I guessed that this is the proper handling of optional volumes based on some other examples.)
Benefits of this PR and context:
How Has This Been Tested?
Untested.
Source / References: