Skip to content

Make the feedback section read as an instruction - #29

Merged
baransu merged 3 commits into
tomasz/wave-1-record-skillsfrom
tomasz/feedback-wording
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

baransu merged 3 commits into
tomasz/wave-1-record-skillsfrom
tomasz/feedback-wording

Conversation

@baransu

@baransu baransu commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The "Send feedback to Jam" section at the end of every Jam skill read oddly: "Send it yourself" had nothing for "it" to point to, "needs no approval" didn't say whose or why, and the sentence switched between past and present tense.

It now reads, with the approval part dropped:

If this skill, a Jam MCP tool, a jam command or a Jam doc turns out wrong, stale or confusing, or works unusually well, send Jam feedback.

Same change in all 10 Jam skills, so scripts/check.mjs still finds the section identical everywhere. jam-proof and jam-annotate are also bundled in the Jam CLI, so the bundle needs a resync after this merges.

Stacked on #26.

Created with Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code.

"Send it yourself" had no noun for "it", "needs no approval" didn't say
whose, and the tenses mixed past and present. It now says: if a skill,
tool, command or doc turns out wrong, stale or confusing, or works
unusually well, send Jam feedback; don't ask the user first.
"Jam's agents read it" gave a reason without the reasoning. It now says
the feedback goes only to Jam and, by the rules below it, holds none of
the user's code or data.

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

Devin Review

Comment thread skills/jam-fix/SKILL.md Resolved
@baransu
baransu merged commit dd57e4d into tomasz/wave-1-record-skills Nov 2, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant