RFC: optional proactive Saved Reset policies - #362
Draft
korkin25 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @masterkain — before expanding a code patch, I would appreciate your thoughts on this optional Saved Reset behavior.
My main goal is to keep an agent's work moving when its current account approaches quota exhaustion. If a reset is available, I would like Pooler to redeem it early enough for the quota to recover, including during a long-running turn, rather than letting the work stop first. I understand that provider latency and in-flight behavior prevent an absolute continuity guarantee.
The proposal has two independently enabled policies, both off by default:
I would also like per-account overrides with optional deployment/Helm defaults. The attached document describes the intended behavior and safeguards; it contains no runtime changes.
Does this direction fit the project? Would you prefer extending the existing modes or separate switches? In particular, which quota/permission signals and active-turn integration would you recommend for timely redemption without wasting credits? If you prefer a smaller first contribution or a different configuration interface, I can adapt the implementation accordingly.
I have paused expansion of a local prototype while seeking your feedback. I need a working setup, but would much rather build this in a form you would accept upstream than maintain a competing implementation.
Validation: proposal-only diff reviewed locally; no live policies changed and no reset credits consumed.