Skip to content

docs(arrival-pack): drop Opus from rule 16's cheaper-model list - #38

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rule-16-drop-opus
Nov 12, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rule-16-drop-opus

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Follows hyperpolymath/rsr-template-repo#330 (merged). Rule 16 bars top-tier models from upkeep work, but its parenthetical listed Opus among the cheaper models. Owner ruling: drop Opus. The list now reads "(Sonnet and Haiku)".

Changes

  • .machine_readable/arrival-pack/arrival-pack.ncl: rule 16 wording, matching the template.
  • CLAUDE.md: regenerated. The generated region was not hand-edited.
  • No licence files touched.

RSR Quality Checklist

Required

  • Tests pass: not run. Only generated documentation text changed, and just validate-claude-md passes.
  • Code is formatted: not applicable. No source code changed.
  • Linter is clean: not applicable. No source code changed.
  • No banned language patterns
  • No unsafe blocks without // SAFETY: comments (none added)
  • No banned functions (none added)
  • SPDX license headers present on all new/modified source files: not applicable. No source files changed, and licence headers were not touched.
  • No secrets, credentials, or .env files included

As Applicable

Not applicable. This changes doctrine wording only: no project state, integrations, architecture, roadmap, dependencies or ABI/FFI change, and no CHANGELOG entry is needed.

Testing

  • just claude-md
  • just validate-claude-md (passes)

Screenshots

Not applicable. One-line text change.

The owner merges. Not merged by the bot.


Generated by Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated model-selection guidance to list Sonnet and Haiku, removing Opus from the cheaper-model examples.

Generated by Claude Code

Follow rsr-template-repo#330: rule 16 now lists only Sonnet and Haiku.
Regenerated CLAUDE.md with just claude-md; just validate-claude-md passes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explain Change →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Walkthrough

The model-selection guidance in Doctrine item 16 removes Opus from the parenthetical list. Sonnet and Haiku remain listed in both the arrival-pack and CLAUDE.md.

Changes: Model Selection Guidance

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update model-selection guidance
.machine_readable/arrival-pack/arrival-pack.ncl, CLAUDE.md
Both entries remove Opus from the parenthetical list of models. Sonnet and Haiku remain listed.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

Possibly related PRs

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 418fe

This is a small documentation wording change that keeps the guidance and its generated copy consistent. It poses no meaningful merge risk.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 4

Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title names the main change: rule 16 in the arrival-pack doctrine no longer lists Opus among the cheaper models. It also names the affected area (arrival-pack). The title is specific and matches t…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description check Passed The description follows the repository template's main sections (Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, Screenshots) and clearly states the purpose: rule 16 listed Opus among the cheaper mo…
Full details: Title check

Explanation

The title names the main change: rule 16 in the arrival-pack doctrine no longer lists Opus among the cheaper models. It also names the affected area (arrival-pack). The title is specific and matches the raw summary and PR objectives. The 'docs(arrival-pack)' prefix follows a conventional-commit style and is accurate because the change edits doctrine wording.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description follows the repository template's main sections (Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, Screenshots) and clearly states the purpose: rule 16 listed Opus among the cheaper models, and the owner ruling drops it, leaving Sonnet and Haiku. It links the related upstream PR (hyperpolymath/rsr-template-repo#330) and lists the two changed files. Testing is described: just claude-md was run and just validate-claude-md passes. Checklist items are marked with reasons where not applicable. The main gaps are minor. The 'Tests pass' box is unchecked with a note that tests were not run, and the SPDX item is marked not applicable. The template's SPDX header comment is not mentioned, but no source files changed, so this is acceptable. The description is substantive and mostly complete.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

Recent review info

Run configuration

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee71876 and 418fe68.

Files selected for processing: 2

  • .machine_readable/arrival-pack/arrival-pack.ncl
  • CLAUDE.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hypatia grid green

🟢 clean · commit 418fe6814674 · run 43145537838 · scope: this change (2 file(s))

Advisory: 11 row(s), worst 🔴 high (0 critical, 9 high) — reported, never grading the change.

Reporter Gate Status Critical High Medium Minor Since previous revision
Hypatia scan gating 🟢 clean 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
panic-attack assail advisory 🟢 clean 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
pons asinorum advisory 🟢 clean 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
finishingbot (release readiness) advisory 🔴 high 0 9 6 0 — no comparable baseline
glambot (presentation quality) advisory 🔵 minor 0 0 0 6 — no comparable baseline
rhodibot (RSR compliance) advisory 🟢 clean 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
accessibilitybot advisory ⚪ not applicable 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
cipherbot advisory ⚪ not applicable 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
echidnabot advisory ⚪ not applicable 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
panicbot advisory ⚪ not applicable 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
seambot advisory ⚪ not applicable 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
sustainabot advisory ⚪ not applicable 0 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
Hypatia scan: 19 finding(s)
  • 19 further finding(s) in files this change does not touch: reported, not graded (0 critical, 1 high).
panic-attack assail: 16 finding(s)
  • 16 further finding(s) in files this change does not touch: reported, not graded (0 critical, 0 high).
pons asinorum: 9 finding(s)
  • 9 further finding(s) in files this change does not touch: reported, not graded (0 critical, 0 high).
finishingbot (release readiness): 174 finding(s)
  • high V1-DOC-ROADMAP.adoc — Required file ROADMAP.adoc not found (Project roadmap).
  • high TOOL-001 — .tool-versions file not found for asdf/mise version management.
  • high SCM-001-NEUROSYM.scm — Required SCM file NEUROSYM.scm not found (Neurosymbolic AI documentation).
  • high SCM-001-AGENTIC.scm — Required SCM file AGENTIC.scm not found (Agentic AI integration documentation).
  • high SCM-001-PLAYBOOK.scm — Required SCM file PLAYBOOK.scm not found (Operational playbooks and procedures).
  • high SCM-001-ECOSYSTEM.scm — Required SCM file ECOSYSTEM.scm not found (Project's place in the ecosystem).
  • high SCM-001-META.scm — Required SCM file META.scm not found (Meta-level information and architectural decisions).
  • high SCM-001-STATE.scm — Required SCM file STATE.scm not found (Project state and progress tracking).
  • high PH-100 — Found 124 placeholders, exceeds maximum allowed (0)
  • medium V1-COM-CONTRIBUTING.md — CONTRIBUTING.md file not found (Contribution guidelines).
  • medium V1-COM-CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md — CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file not found (Code of conduct).
  • medium V1-SEC-001 — SECURITY.md not found for responsible disclosure.
  • medium TEST-001 — Could not determine if this is a Rust or Deno project.
  • medium REL-004 — No SECURITY.md file found
  • medium CLM-006 — CLAUDE.md — Documentation references non-existent file: estate-rules.yml
  • 159 further finding(s) in files this change does not touch: reported, not graded (0 critical, 3 high).
glambot (presentation quality): 94 finding(s)
  • info GS-001 — Install git-seo for comprehensive SEO analysis: https://github.com/hyperpolymath/git-seo
  • info MACH-007 — ECOSYSTEM.scm not found in .machine_readable/ directory.
  • info MACH-007 — META.scm not found in .machine_readable/ directory.
  • info MACH-007 — STATE.scm not found in .machine_readable/ directory.
  • info MACH-005 — No robots.txt found. Consider adding one for crawler control.
  • info VIS-005 — CLAUDE.md:9 — Line 177 characters exceeds max length of 80.
  • 88 further finding(s) in files this change does not touch: reported, not graded (0 critical, 2 high).
rhodibot (RSR compliance): 13 finding(s)
  • 13 further finding(s) in files this change does not touch: reported, not graded (0 critical, 12 high).
accessibilitybot: not_applicable — template default: enrol once the repository serves HTML
  • ⚪ not applicable: template default: enrol once the repository serves HTML
cipherbot: not_applicable — template default: enrol once the repository implements cryptography
  • ⚪ not applicable: template default: enrol once the repository implements cryptography
echidnabot: not_applicable — template default: enrol once the repository carries proofs and an ECHIDNA engine is configured
  • ⚪ not applicable: template default: enrol once the repository carries proofs and an ECHIDNA engine is configured
panicbot: not_applicable — panic-attack is already graded by the verdict grid's own panic-attack row, from static-analysis-gate.yml evidence; enrolling panicbot would report one scanner twice and give two rows that can disagree
  • ⚪ not applicable: panic-attack is already graded by the verdict grid's own panic-attack row, from static-analysis-gate.yml evidence; enrolling panicbot would report one scanner twice and give two rows that can disagree
seambot: not_applicable — template default: enrol once a seam register exists at spec/seams/seam-register.json
  • ⚪ not applicable: template default: enrol once a seam register exists at spec/seams/seam-register.json
sustainabot: not_applicable — reserved fleet slot; no adapter exists (gitbot-fleet bots/sustainabot/README.adoc)
  • ⚪ not applicable: reserved fleet slot; no adapter exists (gitbot-fleet bots/sustainabot/README.adoc)

Scope: static findings reported by each row's tool at the named commit. The table grades only findings in files this change touches, so the colour answers "does this change introduce anything?", not "what does the whole repository still carry?". Standing findings are counted in each accordion and in report.json; the baseline filter remains the place where acknowledged debt is recorded. The lane state is the worst GATING row; advisory rows are listed and counted but never set it. Purple, red, yellow and blue grade the worst GRADED finding present; orange is evidence missing, malformed or a scanner that did not run; grey is an explicit scope exclusion with its reason. No row is a security certification. report.json, badge.json and the raw findings are in the verdict-grid artifact on the linked run.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2026 04:07
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-12T04:07:29.821799Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
418fe68 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit eaa7e97 into main Nov 12, 2026
72 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the docs/rule-16-drop-opus branch November 12, 2026 04:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants