You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Artifacts — owned storage and quarantined results #23
One result is retained in owned storage and admitted from quarantine under an exact authorized reference.
Next planning checkpoint: Init. This is the earliest scope/review conversation, not an assignment or a promise to finish the whole outcome in that week. Selected work starts at #52.
Remaining acceptance
Store one bounded artifact with immutable identity, digest, size, media type, classification, owner and source lineage.
Provide authorized write/read/materialization through a narrow port; refuse path escapes, unexpected symlinks, oversized input and digest mismatch.
Keep untrusted results quarantined until explicit admission; test deletion and stale references without exposing another owner's bytes.
Evidence and handoff
Start from current State of Work and its linked source/tests and owning ADRs. The linked original acceptance remains binding unless a named replacement outcome records its disposition. Detailed scope, negative cases and dated campaign evidence are preserved in preserved scope and evidence; historical evidence does not establish current qualification on its own. Any accepted requirement not selected for this profile needs an explicit route in #62 before this issue closes.
Choose one small implementation or verification slice when this outcome is admitted. Record the responsible contributor, exact profile/revision, observed result, failure/unknown boundary and next checkpoint. The founder reviews and approves all code for this campaign; merge and promotion follow CONTRIBUTING.
Planning reset — 6 November 2026. The original acceptance below remains binding unless a named replacement outcome records its disposition. This is a preserved historical body, not a fresh capability/qualification claim.
Original issue scope and dated evidence before the planning reset
Give one local execution result actual byte custody behind ArtifactRef.
Starting point:Current delivery: a trusted local WAV custody adapter now exists behind an explicit construction seam; configured ingestion and credential-backed caller authority remain unfinished.
First working slice
Store one bounded artifact with immutable identity, digest, size, media type, classification, owner and source lineage.
Provide authorized write/read/materialization through a narrow port; refuse path escapes, unexpected symlinks, oversized input and digest mismatch.
Keep untrusted results quarantined until explicit admission; test deletion and stale references without exposing another owner's bytes.
Connections: Supports #22, #13 and future execution/memory consumers. Owner checks must be enforced before retrieval; remote sharing waits for Ward.
Later: Uploads, additional storage backends, derivative lifecycle and cross-node transfer.
Contribution entry: Complete the remaining configured integration and native retirement/recovery acceptance using the existing local adapter. Current profile:same-host-trusted-bootstrap@1 uses a private root, explicit authorization, quarantine, exact holds/releases and tombstones; it does not provide hostile same-UID rollback detection. Verification: Temporary filesystem and ownership fixtures; no GPU. Shared contribution and touched-docs rules: #52.
Beyond ArtifactRef metadata, an explicitly constructed same-host-trusted-bootstrap@1 Reliquary adapter now quarantines immutable WAV bytes, consults an injected current authorizer, rechecks records on reads/admission, manages exact holds/releases and tombstones before cleanup. Filesystem tests cover real payloads, refusal and clean-root reopening. It remains an unregistered trusted composition seam without configured ingestion or credential-backed Ward integration; native physical retirement and power-loss receipts remain open. The publication follow-up also makes the file-replacement regression establish a distinct device/inode before expecting refusal; the existing custody refusal and preservation checks remain unchanged.
Activity
zenithruneblade commentedon Nov 6, 2026
Planning reset — 6 November 2026. The original acceptance below remains binding unless a named replacement outcome records its disposition. This is a preserved historical body, not a fresh capability/qualification claim.
Original issue scope and dated evidence before the planning reset
Give one local execution result actual byte custody behind ArtifactRef.
Starting point: Current delivery: a trusted local WAV custody adapter now exists behind an explicit construction seam; configured ingestion and credential-backed caller authority remain unfinished.
First working slice
Connections: Supports #22, #13 and future execution/memory consumers. Owner checks must be enforced before retrieval; remote sharing waits for Ward.
Later: Uploads, additional storage backends, derivative lifecycle and cross-node transfer.
References: ADR 06 · ADR 09 · ADR 36.
Contribution entry: Complete the remaining configured integration and native retirement/recovery acceptance using the existing local adapter.
Current profile:
same-host-trusted-bootstrap@1uses a private root, explicit authorization, quarantine, exact holds/releases and tombstones; it does not provide hostile same-UID rollback detection.Verification: Temporary filesystem and ownership fixtures; no GPU. Shared contribution and touched-docs rules: #52.
Delivery review — 12 October 2026
Published source: a913bff.
Beyond ArtifactRef metadata, an explicitly constructed same-host-trusted-bootstrap@1 Reliquary adapter now quarantines immutable WAV bytes, consults an injected current authorizer, rechecks records on reads/admission, manages exact holds/releases and tombstones before cleanup. Filesystem tests cover real payloads, refusal and clean-root reopening. It remains an unregistered trusted composition seam without configured ingestion or credential-backed Ward integration; native physical retirement and power-loss receipts remain open. The publication follow-up also makes the file-replacement regression establish a distinct device/inode before expecting refusal; the existing custody refusal and preservation checks remain unchanged.
Delivery evidence