Skip to content

Update tool cargo:clippy-sarif to 0.8.0#8734

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/cargo-clippy-sarif-0.x
Open

Update tool cargo:clippy-sarif to 0.8.0#8734
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/cargo-clippy-sarif-0.x

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented May 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
cargo:clippy-sarif (source) minor 0.6.50.8.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

psastras/sarif-rs (cargo:clippy-sarif)

v0.8.0: clippy-sarif 0.8.0

Compare Source

Changelog

[clippy-sarif-v0.8.0] - 2025-05-09

🚀 Features
  • Add feature flag to enable fallback setters for builder
  • (serde-sarif) Add miri converter
  • Add miri-sarif
🐛 Bug Fixes
  • Use check name for ruleId
  • Compile clang-tidy regex once
⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.7 to 2.0.8
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9
  • Bump syn from 2.0.90 to 2.0.91
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.94 to 1.0.95
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.133 to 1.0.134
  • Bump quote from 1.0.37 to 1.0.38
  • Bump syn from 2.0.91 to 2.0.92
  • Bump syn from 2.0.92 to 2.0.93
  • Bump serde from 1.0.216 to 1.0.217
  • Bump syn from 2.0.93 to 2.0.94
  • Bump syn from 2.0.94 to 2.0.95
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.25 to 0.2.27
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.134 to 1.0.135
  • Bump clap from 4.5.23 to 4.5.24
  • Bump clap from 4.5.24 to 4.5.26
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.9 to 2.0.10
  • Bump syn from 2.0.95 to 2.0.96
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.10 to 2.0.11
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.92 to 1.0.93
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.27 to 0.2.29
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.135 to 1.0.137
  • Bump DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action from 8 to 9
  • Bump clap from 4.5.26 to 4.5.27
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.137 to 1.0.138
  • Bump syn from 2.0.96 to 2.0.98
  • Bump clap from 4.5.27 to 4.5.28
  • Bump strum from 0.26.3 to 0.27.0
  • Bump strum_macros from 0.26.4 to 0.27.0
  • Bump clap from 4.5.28 to 4.5.29
  • Bump strum_macros from 0.27.0 to 0.27.1
  • Bump clap from 4.5.29 to 4.5.30
  • Bump strum from 0.27.0 to 0.27.1
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.138 to 1.0.139
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.95 to 1.0.96
  • Bump serde from 1.0.217 to 1.0.218
  • Bump ossf/scorecard-action from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1
  • Bump clap from 4.5.30 to 4.5.31
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.96 to 1.0.97
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.11 to 2.0.12
  • Bump quote from 1.0.38 to 1.0.39
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.93 to 1.0.94
  • Bump syn from 2.0.98 to 2.0.99
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.139 to 1.0.140
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.29 to 0.2.30
  • Bump cargo_metadata from 0.19.1 to 0.19.2
  • Bump serde from 1.0.218 to 1.0.219
  • Bump syn from 2.0.99 to 2.0.100
  • Bump clap from 4.5.31 to 4.5.32
  • Bump quote from 1.0.39 to 1.0.40
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.30 to 0.2.31
  • Bump typed-builder from 0.20.0 to 0.20.1
  • Bump typed-builder from 0.20.1 to 0.21.0
  • Bump codespan-reporting from 0.11.1 to 0.12.0
  • Bump clap from 4.5.32 to 4.5.33
  • Bump clap from 4.5.33 to 4.5.34
  • Bump clap from 4.5.34 to 4.5.35
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.31 to 0.2.32
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.97 to 1.0.98
  • Bump clap from 4.5.35 to 4.5.36
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.94 to 1.0.95
  • Bump clap from 4.5.36 to 4.5.37
  • Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 16 to 17
  • Bump syn from 2.0.100 to 2.0.101
  • Bump duct from 0.13.7 to 1.0.0
  • Bump duct_sh from 0.13.7 to 1.0.0

v0.7.0: clippy-sarif 0.7.0

Compare Source

Changelog

[clippy-sarif-v0.7.0] - 2024-12-18

🐛 Bug Fixes
  • Bare enums serialize with their tags
⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks
  • Bump syn from 2.0.76 to 2.0.77
  • Bump clap from 4.5.16 to 4.5.17
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.127 to 1.0.128
  • Bump serde from 1.0.209 to 1.0.210
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.86 to 1.0.87
  • Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 13 to 14
  • Bump DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action from 7 to 8
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.87 to 1.0.88
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.88 to 1.0.89
  • Bump thiserror from 1.0.63 to 1.0.64
  • Bump clap from 4.5.17 to 4.5.18
  • Bump syn from 2.0.77 to 2.0.79
  • Bump regex from 1.10.6 to 1.11.0
  • Bump clap from 4.5.18 to 4.5.19
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.86 to 1.0.87
  • Bump clap from 4.5.19 to 4.5.20
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.87 to 1.0.88
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.128 to 1.0.129
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.89 to 1.0.90
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.129 to 1.0.130
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.130 to 1.0.132
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.22 to 0.2.24
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.90 to 1.0.91
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.88 to 1.0.89
  • Bump thiserror from 1.0.64 to 1.0.65
  • Bump serde from 1.0.210 to 1.0.213
  • Bump syn from 2.0.82 to 2.0.83
  • Bump syn from 2.0.83 to 2.0.85
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.24 to 0.2.25
  • Bump regex from 1.11.0 to 1.11.1
  • Bump serde from 1.0.213 to 1.0.214
  • Bump thiserror from 1.0.65 to 1.0.66
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.91 to 1.0.92
  • Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 14 to 15
  • Bump syn from 2.0.86 to 2.0.87
  • Bump thiserror from 1.0.66 to 1.0.68
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.92 to 1.0.93
  • Bump thiserror from 1.0.68 to 2.0.0
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3
  • Bump serde from 1.0.214 to 1.0.215
  • Bump clap from 4.5.20 to 4.5.21
  • Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 15 to 16
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.132 to 1.0.133
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.89 to 1.0.91
  • Bump cargo_metadata from 0.18.1 to 0.19.0
  • Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.91 to 1.0.92
  • Bump syn from 2.0.87 to 2.0.89
  • Bump syn from 2.0.89 to 2.0.90
  • Bump anyhow from 1.0.93 to 1.0.94
  • Bump cargo_metadata from 0.19.0 to 0.19.1
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4
  • Bump clap from 4.5.21 to 4.5.22
  • Bump clap from 4.5.22 to 4.5.23
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.4 to 2.0.6
  • Bump serde from 1.0.215 to 1.0.216
  • Bump thiserror from 2.0.6 to 2.0.7

v0.6.6: clippy-sarif 0.6.6

Compare Source

Changelog

[clippy-sarif-v0.6.6] - 2024-09-02

📚 Documentation
  • Fix documentation link
  • Amend install instructions
⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks
  • Bump clap from 4.5.13 to 4.5.14
  • Bump serde from 1.0.204 to 1.0.205
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.122 to 1.0.124
  • Bump clap from 4.5.14 to 4.5.15
  • Bump serde from 1.0.205 to 1.0.206
  • Bump syn from 2.0.72 to 2.0.74
  • Bump serde from 1.0.206 to 1.0.207
  • Bump serde from 1.0.207 to 1.0.208
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.124 to 1.0.125
  • Bump clap from 4.5.15 to 4.5.16
  • Bump syn from 2.0.74 to 2.0.75
  • Bump typed-builder from 0.19.1 to 0.20.0
  • Bump quote from 1.0.36 to 1.0.37
  • Bump serde from 1.0.208 to 1.0.209
  • Bump serde_json from 1.0.125 to 1.0.127
  • Bump syn from 2.0.75 to 2.0.76
  • Bump prettyplease from 0.2.20 to 0.2.22

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 20, 2026 01:15
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented May 20, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 20, 2026 1:15am
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 20, 2026 1:15am
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 20, 2026 1:15am

@cursor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cursor Bot commented May 20, 2026

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk: this only updates the pinned cargo:clippy-sarif tool version used in CI, with no production/runtime code changes.

Overview
Updates CI tool pinning in .config/mise/config.ci.toml, bumping cargo:clippy-sarif from 0.6.5 to 0.8.0 (leaving cargo:sarif-fmt unchanged).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit e6b5852. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 20, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link
Copy Markdown

augmentcode Bot commented May 20, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the CI-pinned cargo:clippy-sarif tool version.
Changes: Bumps cargo:clippy-sarif from 0.6.5 to 0.8.0 in .config/mise/config.ci.toml to keep clippy SARIF generation up to date.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@augmentcode augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.08%. Comparing base (7cd1d95) to head (e6b5852).
⚠️ Report is 40 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8734      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.08%   62.08%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1341     1341              
  Lines      135072   135072              
  Branches     5744     5744              
==========================================
- Hits        83856    83854       -2     
- Misses      50308    50310       +2     
  Partials      908      908              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.19% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 26.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 29.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 92.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 20, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks


Comparing deps/tool/cargo-clippy-sarif-0.x (e6b5852) with main (2c06bcb)

Open in CodSpeed

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$9.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.261 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.11 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.907 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.611 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.11 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.868 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.953 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.35 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.16 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.327 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.77 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.33 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.596 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.949 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.47 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.373 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.20 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$62.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.602 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$40.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$313 \mathrm{ms} \pm 637 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$79.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$64.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.658 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$224 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$18.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.776 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.776 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$25.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$25.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$26.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.558 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.940 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$70.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.155 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 592 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$76.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$83.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$90.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.576 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$95.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.807 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$78.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$99.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$83.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$90.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$90.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$90.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$82.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$421 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.81 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants