Skip to content

Conversation

@blakeli0
Copy link
Contributor

@blakeli0 blakeli0 commented Feb 9, 2026

enable releases

@blakeli0 blakeli0 requested review from a team as code owners February 9, 2026 21:23
@blakeli0 blakeli0 requested a review from PhongChuong February 9, 2026 21:23
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: m Pull request size is medium. api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquery API. labels Feb 9, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @blakeli0, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces the necessary infrastructure to support a new release line, specifically for version 2.58.x. It configures automated release processes to streamline future deployments and establishes robust branch protection rules to ensure code quality and stability for this new branch. The changes aim to enable a smooth and controlled release workflow for the 2.58.x series.

Highlights

  • Release Configuration: Automated release management has been configured for the new 2.58.x branch using release-please, designating it as a java-backport release type.
  • Branch Protection: Comprehensive branch protection rules have been established for the 2.58.x branch, requiring at least one approving review, code owner reviews, and successful completion of various status checks including dependencies, lint, clirr, units, and integration tests.
Changelog
  • .github/release-please.yml
    • Added a new entry for the 2.58.x branch, enabling handleGHRelease and setting releaseType to java-backport.
  • .github/sync-repo-settings.yaml
    • Introduced a new branch protection rule for the 2.58.x pattern.
    • Configured isAdminEnforced to true, requiredApprovingReviewCount to 1, and requiresCodeOwnerReviews to true.
    • Specified a list of requiredStatusCheckContexts including various build, test, and quality checks.
Activity
  • No human activity (comments, reviews) has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces configuration for a new 2.58.x branch, enabling release-please and setting up branch protection rules. The changes are mostly straightforward, but there is a potential issue with the branch protection settings that could impact code quality and stability.

isAdminEnforced: true
requiredApprovingReviewCount: 1
requiresCodeOwnerReviews: true
requiresStrictStatusChecks: false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Setting requiresStrictStatusChecks to false can allow pull requests to be merged even if they are out of date with the base branch and would fail status checks. This can lead to a broken branch and makes it harder to maintain a stable codebase. It is generally recommended to set this to true to ensure that all required status checks pass on the latest code before merging.

    requiresStrictStatusChecks: true

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquery API. size: m Pull request size is medium.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant