-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 884
storage(feat): Add accept encoding gzip for media operation only #26530
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
shubhangi-google
wants to merge
7
commits into
googleapis:main
Choose a base branch
from
shubhangi-google:add_accept_encoding_gzip_for_media_operation_only
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+51
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f82a200
adding header for storage_upload and storage_download
shubhangi-google 9344f30
udo unwanted change
shubhangi-google 33c3e42
undo
shubhangi-google 8b6b896
adding header as optional header
shubhangi-google 751d8c3
adding
shubhangi-google 182f1ef
adding
shubhangi-google 1d3bee1
refactor
shubhangi-google File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we doing this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we are checking if the accept-encoding header already exists if not then we will add it
(casecmp is being used to check the header with respect to case senstivity)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
headeris a hashmap, right? Can't we directly checkheader['accept-encoding]?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, header is a hash, but it's a standard Ruby Hash where keys are case-sensitive. Because HTTP header names are case-insensitive, a user might have already provided it as 'Accept-Encoding' or 'ACCEPT-ENCODING'.
If we used header['accept-encoding'] directly, it would return nil if the casing didn't match exactly. Using any? with casecmp ensures we detect the header regardless of how the user cased it, so we don't add a duplicate.