Skip to content

Qualify KnownLayout metadata extraction - #3625

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t
Open

Qualify KnownLayout metadata extraction#3625
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated KnownLayout implementations called pointer_to_metadata through a
concrete trailing type. A same-named inherent method could therefore capture
the call and supply metadata that violates the unsafe trait's layout contract.

Emit a fully trait-qualified call for both the derived type and its generated
MaybeUninit form. Extend the output hygiene check to reject unqualified
associated-item syntax, and add compile-time and semantic regressions for an
inherent-method collision.

Closes #3621

Authored by an AI agent acting on Josh Liebow-Feeser's behalf.


⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t && git checkout -b pr-Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

Generated KnownLayout implementations called pointer_to_metadata through a
concrete trailing type. A same-named inherent method could therefore capture
the call and supply metadata that violates the unsafe trait's layout contract.

Emit a fully trait-qualified call for both the derived type and its generated
MaybeUninit form. Extend the output hygiene check to reject unqualified
associated-item syntax, and add compile-time and semantic regressions for an
inherent-method collision.

Closes #3621

*Authored by an AI agent acting on Josh Liebow-Feeser's behalf.*

gherrit-pr-id: Gkpenpjjuex55evmm52puxsa34xtjgc7t
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-06T00:03:55.679120Z 7ac962f Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (2dad389) to head (7ac962f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3625   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.85%   91.85%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        6093     6093           
=======================================
  Hits         5597     5597           
  Misses        496      496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf

joshlf commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Chef's kiss.

Reviewed commit: 7ac962f373

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Security Advisory: Inherent method capture permits out-of-bounds splits of derived types

2 participants