Skip to content

Seal derive padding witnesses - #3623

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu
Open

Seal derive padding witnesses#3623
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The IntoBytes derive relies on const-generic padding witnesses, but
downstream safe code could implement the public witness traits for nonzero
padding values and make the derive emit an unsound impl.

Require private predicates over the complete type-and-const tuple, with
implementations only for zero static padding and false dynamic padding. Add
compile-fail tests showing that direct false witness implementations no longer
satisfy the authentic Zerocopy traits.

Closes #3614

Authored by an AI agent acting on Josh Liebow-Feeser's behalf.


Latest Update: v3 — Compare vs v2

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v2 v1 Base
v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v2 vs v1 vs Base
v1 vs Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu && git checkout -b pr-Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-05T23:52:54.113815Z 1b1460b Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Comment thread zerocopy/src/util/macro_util.rs Outdated
Comment thread zerocopy/zerocopy-derive/tests/ui/dynamic_padding_free_witness.rs Outdated
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (2dad389) to head (1b1460b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3623   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.85%   91.85%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        6093     6093           
=======================================
  Hits         5597     5597           
  Misses        496      496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu branch from 5eba0c8 to d6c5c71 Compare September 5, 2026 00:31
The IntoBytes derive relies on const-generic padding witnesses, but
downstream safe code could implement the public witness traits for nonzero
padding values and make the derive emit an unsound impl.

Require private predicates over the complete type-and-const tuple, with
implementations only for zero static padding and false dynamic padding. Add
compile-fail tests showing that direct false witness implementations no longer
satisfy the authentic Zerocopy traits.

Closes #3614

*Authored by an AI agent acting on Josh Liebow-Feeser's behalf.*

gherrit-pr-id: Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gowln6kqlymxhdw2dwz5uf46fnryyxouu branch from d6c5c71 to 1b1460b Compare September 5, 2026 23:49
@joshlf

joshlf commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: 1b1460b862

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Soundness Advisory: Safe padding witnesses bypass IntoBytes validation

2 participants