-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Add L400 GitHub Enterprise Administration & Governance documentation #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: CalinL <10718943+CalinL@users.noreply.github.com>
…oc 08) Co-authored-by: CalinL <10718943+CalinL@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: CalinL <10718943+CalinL@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: CalinL <10718943+CalinL@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR implements comprehensive expert-level (L400) documentation for GitHub Enterprise Cloud administration and governance. The documentation was created based on an approved plan and provides deep technical content including enterprise hierarchy, organization strategies, identity management (with dedicated EMU coverage), policy inheritance, repository governance, security/compliance, best practices aligned with the GitHub Well-Architected Framework, and reference architectures.
Changes:
- Added 10 comprehensive documentation files covering all aspects of GitHub Enterprise administration and governance
- Updated README.md to feature the L400 workshop documentation prominently with categorized navigation
- Included 30+ Mermaid diagrams for visual architecture representation and 100+ practical code examples
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 12 out of 13 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/initial-prompt.md | Planning document outlining documentation objectives and source materials |
| docs/final-prompt-plan.md | Detailed implementation plan with file specifications and structure |
| docs/01-enterprise-hierarchy.md | Enterprise account structure, roles, multi-org management patterns |
| docs/07-repository-governance.md | Repository settings, rulesets vs branch protection, lifecycle management |
| docs/08-security-compliance.md | GitHub Advanced Security features, compliance certifications, audit logging |
| docs/09-best-practices-waf.md | GitHub Well-Architected Framework with 5 pillars and enterprise patterns |
| docs/10-reference-architecture.md | Consolidated architecture diagrams, quick reference cards, integration patterns |
| README.md | Updated with L400 workshop section and categorized documentation links |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Implements comprehensive expert-level documentation for GitHub Enterprise Cloud administration and governance based on the approved plan in
final-prompt-plan.md.Documentation Created (10 files, 487KB, 14,537 lines)
Enterprise & Organization
Identity & Access Management
Governance & Security
Best Practices & Reference
Technical Content
Each document includes:
Example architecture from
10-reference-architecture.md:graph TB subgraph "GitHub Enterprise Cloud" Enterprise[Enterprise Account] subgraph "Organizations" OrgProd[Production Org] OrgDev[Development Org] end subgraph "Security Layer" GHAS[GitHub Advanced Security] CodeQL[Code Scanning] end end subgraph "Identity Provider" IdP[Entra ID / Okta] SCIM[SCIM Provisioning] end IdP -->|SAML Auth| Enterprise SCIM -->|Provision Users| OrgProd GHAS --> CodeQLREADME Update
Added L400 workshop section at top with categorized links to all documentation:
Preserved existing hands-on labs section below workshop documentation.
Original prompt
Start implementation
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting assistance in refining a plan and creating a final-prompt-plan.md file for agentic implementation. The user then specified various topics to include in the documentation, such as enterprise hierarchy, IAM flow, and best practices for GitHub administration. Subsequent requests involved updating the plan to include a section on GitHub EMU, ensuring the workshop title and description were at the beginning of the README, and reevaluating the entire plan for comprehensive technical documentation. The user finally requested to start the implementation.][Intent Mapping:
[Technical Inventory:
[Code Archaeology:
[Progress Assessment:
[Context Validation: All critical information for continuation is captured, including user requests for specific content and structural changes.]
[Recent Commands Analysis:
1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: - "Help me refine the plan and create a final-prompt-plan.md file with the final plan once you improved and make it ready for an agentic implementation." - "update the plan to include a section dedicated to GitHub EMU and all the enhancements and advantages, best practices for EMU." - "It should be at the beginning of the readme the section not at the end. and it should have the workshop title with a short description." - Session Context: The conversation flowed from planning and structuring documentation to initiating implementation based on user-defined requirements. - User Intent Evolution: The user shifted from requesting a refined plan to specifying content and structure, culminating in a request to start implementation.- Technical Foundation:
- GitHub EMU: Focus on enhancements and best practices for Enterprise Managed Users.
- Documentation Structure: Emphasis on README and final-prompt-plan.md files.
- Topics for Documentation: Enterprise hierarchy, IAM flow, policy inheritance, organizational strategies, and GitHub administration best practices.
- Codebase Status:
- File Name: final-prompt-plan.md
- Purpose: To serve as a comprehensive plan for GitHub administration and governance documentation.
- Current State: User requested specific content updates and structural changes.
- Key Code Segments: Not specified in recent exchanges.
- Dependencies: Related to overall documentation structure and content.
- Problem Resolution:
- Issues Encountered: None explicitly stated; focus was on planning and structuring.
- Solutions Implemented: User-defined changes to documentation structure and content.
- Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts mentioned.
- Lessons Learned: Importance of clear structure and comprehensive content in technical documentation.
- Progress Tracking:
- Completed Tasks: User ha...
Created from VS Code.
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.