docs: add pre-pr doc cross-link audit#31
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a landed TR-009 “Pre-PR Doc Cross-Link Audit” to documentation workflows: new design doc, checklist entry, WORKFLOW/CONTRIBUTING updates, backlog archival moves, and legend/index updates to require a lightweight pre-review cross-link verification for doc-heavy branches. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are documentation/metadata updates without multi-component control-flow requiring visualization) Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/design/TR-009-pre-pr-doc-cross-link-audit.md (1)
97-100: Consider making trigger targets explicit as filenames or “doc surfaces.”The current list mixes conceptual surfaces and filename-like labels. Making this explicit (for example,
README.md,CONTRIBUTING.md, etc., or “canonical doc surfaces such as …”) would reduce interpretation drift for maintainers/agents.Proposed wording tweak
-The audit should run when a branch changes top-level or canonical docs such as -README, CONTRIBUTING, WORKFLOW, ARCHITECTURE, SECURITY, API, THREAT_MODEL, -BENCHMARKS, and planning indexes. +The audit should run when a branch changes top-level or canonical doc surfaces +such as README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, WORKFLOW.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, SECURITY.md, +API.md, THREAT_MODEL.md, BENCHMARKS.md, and planning indexes.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/design/TR-009-pre-pr-doc-cross-link-audit.md` around lines 97 - 100, Update the ambiguous trigger-target wording in TR-009-pre-pr-doc-cross-link-audit.md so it lists explicit filename targets or clearly labels them as “canonical doc surfaces”; replace the current mixed terms (README, CONTRIBUTING, WORKFLOW, ARCHITECTURE, SECURITY, API, THREAT_MODEL, BENCHMARKS, and planning indexes) with explicit examples like README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, WORKFLOW.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, SECURITY.md, API.md, THREAT_MODEL.md, BENCHMARKS.md (or the phrase “canonical doc surfaces such as …”) so maintainers/agents cannot misinterpret which files should trigger the audit.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/design/TR-009-pre-pr-doc-cross-link-audit.md`:
- Around line 97-100: Update the ambiguous trigger-target wording in
TR-009-pre-pr-doc-cross-link-audit.md so it lists explicit filename targets or
clearly labels them as “canonical doc surfaces”; replace the current mixed terms
(README, CONTRIBUTING, WORKFLOW, ARCHITECTURE, SECURITY, API, THREAT_MODEL,
BENCHMARKS, and planning indexes) with explicit examples like README.md,
CONTRIBUTING.md, WORKFLOW.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, SECURITY.md, API.md,
THREAT_MODEL.md, BENCHMARKS.md (or the phrase “canonical doc surfaces such as
…”) so maintainers/agents cannot misinterpret which files should trigger the
audit.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 1169c298-6589-43f2-a43d-d7deddb3f8a9
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
CHANGELOG.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdWORKFLOW.mddocs/BACKLOG/README.mddocs/DOCS_CHECKLIST.mddocs/archive/BACKLOG/README.mddocs/archive/BACKLOG/TR-009-pre-pr-doc-cross-link-audit.mddocs/design/README.mddocs/design/TR-009-pre-pr-doc-cross-link-audit.mddocs/legends/TR-truth.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/BACKLOG/README.md
|
@coderabbitai review please 🥕 |
|
🧠 Learnings used✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Summary
Verification
Summary by CodeRabbit