Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.
❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.
Want reviews to match your repository better? Bugbot Learning can learn team-specific rules from PR activity. A team admin can enable Learning in the Cursor dashboard.
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5384ad3. Configure here.
sansynx
requested review from
logaretm,
msonnb,
nicohrubec and
s1gr1d
and removed request for
a team
October 7, 2026 13:12
Author
|
could a collaborator add the Trigger: getsentry tests label after reviewing this and authorize the Vercel preview? those checks are waiting on approval |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Fixes #126120
Current master already rejects
requestPromise()through its fallback, but a rejected fetch still skips directrequest()error and completion callbacks.Route non-abort fetch failures through the existing error and completion handlers with status 0 and no JSON body, then clean up the active request. Keep these failures classified as
RequestErrorso the SDK's no-response filter continues to apply to main errors and causes. Intentional cancellations remain silent, and server errors remain reportable.Validation:
SENTRY_OXLINT_TYPEAWARE=falseand--threads 1git diff --checkpassedTests used the existing Jest runner, standard setup and aliases, pinned Linux Node 24.14.0 and a private cache. Full local typechecking, application build and browser verification were not run. The earlier local
prekattempt stalled before its hooks executed; CI pre-commit lint, TypeScript and oxlint passed on the previous commit. The new push will rerun CI.AI assistance was used to prepare and validate this change
Legal Boilerplate
Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. and is gonna need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this here PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.