Skip to content

MDEXP-919 - 504 Gateway Timeout error when export deleted marc bib records from Member tenant on ECS Sprint testing environment#704

Merged
obozhko-folio merged 19 commits into
masterfrom
MDEXP-919
May 20, 2026
Merged

MDEXP-919 - 504 Gateway Timeout error when export deleted marc bib records from Member tenant on ECS Sprint testing environment#704
obozhko-folio merged 19 commits into
masterfrom
MDEXP-919

Conversation

@obozhko-folio
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@obozhko-folio obozhko-folio commented May 19, 2026

MDEXP-919 - 504 Gateway Timeout error when export deleted marc bib records from Member tenant on ECS Sprint testing environment

Purpose

Remove non-deleted shared MARC records from the response in member tenant without timeout 504 error after 1 minute.

Approach

Use /source-storage/source-records?idType=INSTANCE with all found deleted record ids to check leader in the central tenant.

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?

    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • Check logging
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?

    • Were any API paths or methods changed, added or removed?
    • Were there any schema changes?
    • Did any of the interface versions change?
    • Were permissions changed, added, or removed?
    • Are there new interface dependencies?
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@obozhko-folio obozhko-folio self-assigned this May 19, 2026
@obozhko-folio obozhko-folio requested a review from a team May 19, 2026 17:41
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@obozhko-folio obozhko-folio merged commit 214253f into master May 20, 2026
16 checks passed
@obozhko-folio obozhko-folio deleted the MDEXP-919 branch May 20, 2026 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants