Skip to content

✨ Add alias_priority parameter to Field - #1727

Open
YuriiMotov wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
add-alias_priority-param-to-field
Open

✨ Add alias_priority parameter to Field#1727
YuriiMotov wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
add-alias_priority-param-to-field

Conversation

@YuriiMotov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

These parameter is not currently supported by sqlmodel.Field and people have to use workaround passing them via schema_extra.

This PR will still support that workaround, but will emit a warning encouraging to pass such parameters directly to Field

@YuriiMotov YuriiMotov added the feature New feature or request label Jan 28, 2026
@YuriiMotov
YuriiMotov marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2026 21:10
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict label Feb 20, 2026
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict label Feb 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict label Apr 3, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has a merge conflict that needs to be resolved.

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict label Apr 3, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict label Aug 28, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has a merge conflict that needs to be resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict feature New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants