Skip to content

Import Tezos X doc - #436

Open
NicNomadic wants to merge 59 commits into
mainfrom
import-tx-doc
Open

Import Tezos X doc#436
NicNomadic wants to merge 59 commits into
mainfrom
import-tx-doc

Conversation

@NicNomadic

@NicNomadic NicNomadic commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

NB: Don't merge before the upgrade is successfully voted, that is, don't merge before the Cooldown period!

Imports the doc prepared in the Tezos X repo into the current repo to keep the exact same old Etherlink style.

To see a detailed history reflecting how the imported content was developed, see the origin MR in the TX repo: https://gitlab.com/tezos/xdocs/-/merge_requests/20

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs-etherlink Ready Ready Preview Aug 12, 2026 3:02pm

Request Review

Comment thread docs/overview/index.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/index.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/index.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/index.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/index.md
Comment thread docs/evm/get-started/network-information.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/get-started.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/accounts-and-aliases.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/accounts-and-aliases.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/overview/accounts-and-aliases.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: skenaja <510285+skenaja@users.noreply.github.com>

@NicNomadic NicNomadic left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Migrated the pending questions from https://gitlab.com/tezos/xdocs/-/merge_requests/20

Comment thread docs/overview/index.md
Comment thread docs/overview/native-atomic-composability.md
Comment thread docs/evm/get-started/sending-transactions.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/evm/get-started/sending-transactions.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/evm/get-started/sending-transactions.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/evm/get-started/sending-transactions.md
Co-authored-by: NicNomadic <148877430+NicNomadic@users.noreply.github.com>

The goal for each interface is to stay as compatible as possible with the original ecosystem it supports — Ethereum for the EVM interface, and Tezos Layer 1 for the Michelson interface. Where differences exist, they are documented in the respective interface sections.

### Bridging vs. NAC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can someone take a look to this section (added to solve #437) ?

This was referenced Aug 13, 2026
@NicNomadic

NicNomadic commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

in response to #436 (comment), part:

The legacy pages weren't reconciled with the new narrative. (Partially done: [...]. Still open ☐: "Etherlink EVM" remains in 41 inherited files next to new pages saying "the EVM interface" — fine as a tracked follow-up sweep.)

Tracked as issue #445

@NicNomadic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Conventions: icon array replaced by a label→icon map (done ✅); still open ☐: filesystem vs sidebar alignment between the two interface sections, a single title/H1 rule, a one-page style guide so the next import doesn't diverge again

Tracked as issue #446

@NicNomadic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Standard L2 pages readers will look for eventually: consolidated Security/Audits, bug bounty, unified contract addresses.

Tracked as issue #447

Comment thread docs/progress/upgrades.md

## Etherlink 7.0 (Ganesha)

The Etherlink 7.0 upgrade went live on 13 August 2026 through the slow kernel governance process and introduced a series of new features preparing for the launch of Tezos X.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adjust this line with the definitive date and upgrade type

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants