Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Looks good in principle. Just the formatting nit I pointed out. |
Contributor
Author
|
@daveedvdv-nvidia I think your nit message got lost, I assume you meant I should align the variable identifiers? If so, I believe I updated it to look as rest of codebase. |
Ah, I probably forgot to click something...
Exactly. Your change looks good! |
daveedvdv-nvidia
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2026
|
Merged as b8d3a78 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Locally I built this with trunk GCC and noticed warnings:
Tried a couple of different GCC versions, and first one that warns is GCC 16.
Minimum warning to see this:
-Wunused-but-set-variable=2, which is implied by the buildIt seems GCC warns now if a variable is only used in a pack expansion over an empty pack.
I believe this is equivalent to: https://godbolt.org/z/o4535qKqc
Don't think it has much interesting info, but just noting how I configured and built:
If needed, I can cook up a podman reproducer
Not very relevant, but interesting to me, the warning disappears if
operator[]is not on class, but pointer:https://godbolt.org/z/1G1aWcKan
After this fix, haven't seen any warning over full build