Skip to content

Update the Time Architecture - #3200

Open
lavrovvalera wants to merge 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
lavrovvalera:vala_time_feat_arch
Open

lavrovvalera wants to merge 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
lavrovvalera:vala_time_feat_arch

Conversation

@lavrovvalera

@lavrovvalera lavrovvalera commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Add Terms and Definitions glossary (glossary.rst)
  • Refactor architecture document: add sphinx needs abstraction, move the
    dynamic description to the Time Module
  • Refer terms from glossary in Feature Requirements
  • Fix typos

Part of eclipse-score/time#85

the module part is adapted here: eclipse-score/time#188

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documentation preview for this pull request is available at:
pr-3200: https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/pr-3200/


vc ..> veh : synchronized to (PTP)
lc ..> os : reads
ac ..> someip : IPC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some/ip is given in the archtiecture picture, but in the sphinx needs there is no dependency to communicatio / Some/ip defined. Therefore architecture picture deviates from model architecture. Also is there some interface to some baselibs/OS funktionality there ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the static and dynamic design is moved towards module design documentaiton.
thus it will not be here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here is the module part eclipse-score/time#188

- Add Terms and Definitions glossary (glossary.rst)
- Refactor architecture document: add sphinx needs abstraction, move the
  dynamic description to the Time Module
- Refer terms from glossary in Feature Requirements
- Fix typos

@FScholPer FScholPer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- refactor the Stakeholder reqs: remove the feature-like reqs
- refactor the Feature reqs: clarify the asil status, link to the
  platfrom aou
- refactor platfrom aos: remove duplicated req
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog
Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants