feat(mw/log): add Linux syslog backend for LogMode::kSystem

[btirunagaru]

Description

Adds a Linux syslog(3) backend for mw::log's LogMode::kSystem slot
(SyslogBackend + SyslogRecorderFactory + BackendRegistrant), following
the existing QNX slog backend's design. Includes unit tests against
score_baselibs//score/os/mocklib:syslog_mock covering log-level to
syslog-priority mapping and slot lifecycle.

Depends on the companion score::os::Syslog OS wrapper contributed to
baselibs (eclipse-score/baselibs#501,
@score_baselibs//score/os:syslog) — should merge/release together.

Related ticket

closes #270

Relates to eclipse-score/baselibs#501, implemented in eclipse-score/baselibs#502

[github-actions]

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output

[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: a563ead0-27de-4e56-bb87-f198a4cb6256
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 4 packages loaded
WARNING: Target pattern parsing failed.
ERROR: Skipping '//:license-check': no such target '//:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package '' defined by /home/runner/work/logging/logging/BUILD
ERROR: no such target '//:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package '' defined by /home/runner/work/logging/logging/BUILD
INFO: Elapsed time: 18.971s
INFO: 0 processes.
ERROR: Build did NOT complete successfully
ERROR: Build failed. Not running target

[rmaddikery]

Thanks for the contribution. I would first request the following:
Component requirements updated/added to clarify the expectation and understand how it could be achieved. Hence additionally supporting static/dynamic diagrams. Once this is finalized we can look into the source files. Please note that we are still in the migration phase of the repository from an internal one. Until we have established the quality gating and traceability of the requirements, no changes are merged here directly. In that regard we ask you for your patience. If you have questions please reach out to us in the Logging CFT: https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/3192

[btirunagaru]

Thanks for the contribution. I would first request the following: Component requirements updated/added to clarify the expectation and understand how it could be achieved. Hence additionally supporting static/dynamic diagrams. Once this is finalized we can look into the source files. Please note that we are still in the migration phase of the repository from an internal one. Until we have established the quality gating and traceability of the requirements, no changes are merged here directly. In that regard we ask you for your patience. If you have questions please reach out to us in the Logging CFT: https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/3192

updated the component requirements and other documents as requested. please let us know the timeline for submission of this change. we require this support to deploy the product on the linux aarch64 on our targets- as we cannot ship the component with console logs enabled in our PDLC.

[rmaddikery]

Thanks for the contribution. I would first request the following: Component requirements updated/added to clarify the expectation and understand how it could be achieved. Hence additionally supporting static/dynamic diagrams. Once this is finalized we can look into the source files. Please note that we are still in the migration phase of the repository from an internal one. Until we have established the quality gating and traceability of the requirements, no changes are merged here directly. In that regard we ask you for your patience. If you have questions please reach out to us in the Logging CFT: https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/3192

updated the component requirements and other documents as requested. please let us know the timeline for submission of this change. we require this support to deploy the product on the linux aarch64 on our targets- as we cannot ship the component with console logs enabled in our PDLC.

Timeline is v1.0 as per: https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/milestones
If this is urgent, then we can try our best to include it after v0.9 is released

[btirunagaru]

Thanks for the contribution. I would first request the following: Component requirements updated/added to clarify the expectation and understand how it could be achieved. Hence additionally supporting static/dynamic diagrams. Once this is finalized we can look into the source files. Please note that we are still in the migration phase of the repository from an internal one. Until we have established the quality gating and traceability of the requirements, no changes are merged here directly. In that regard we ask you for your patience. If you have questions please reach out to us in the Logging CFT: https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/3192

updated the component requirements and other documents as requested. please let us know the timeline for submission of this change. we require this support to deploy the product on the linux aarch64 on our targets- as we cannot ship the component with console logs enabled in our PDLC.

Timeline is v1.0 as per: https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/milestones If this is urgent, then we can try our best to include it after v0.9 is released

yes, this is needed to meet our internal timelines. I would appreciate ,if we can accommodate to release this in 0.9.
Assuming community will benefit from this as well. Relatively independent feature as its adding syslog (similar to slog for qnx - which is already present) capability . writing logs to a system syslog ( which is only invoked if the users go with kSystem ).

[btirunagaru]

@rmaddikery Can you please review this and take to the next steps ? would like to get this get merged as soon as practical.

[rmaddikery]

@btirunagaru Please cleanup the commits (clean history; ideally squash) and then I will import it and sync it back as discussed over the meeting.

[btirunagaru]

@btirunagaru Please cleanup the commits (clean history; ideally squash) and then I will import it and sync it back as discussed over the meeting.

@rmaddikery done -squashed both PRs.

[rmaddikery]

A Requirements-based test needs to be linked. E.g.:

logging/score/mw/log/detail/wait_free_producer_queue/wait_free_alternating_writer_test.cpp

Line 33 in 2745e3c

RecordProperty("PartiallyVerifies", "comp_req__log__cross_locking");

[rmaddikery]

@btirunagaru Please cleanup the commits (clean history; ideally squash) and then I will import it and sync it back as discussed over the meeting.

@rmaddikery done -squashed both PRs.

@btirunagaru please rebase and push again. Additionally fix:
#271 (comment)

[btirunagaru]

@btirunagaru Please cleanup the commits (clean history; ideally squash) and then I will import it and sync it back as discussed over the meeting.

@rmaddikery done -squashed both PRs.

@btirunagaru please rebase and push again. Additionally fix: #271 (comment)

Done addressed the comment about and cleaned up and squashed it.