Skip to content

fix: replace blocked action in publish-netlify workflow#3115

Merged
svor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/publish-netlify-blocked-action
May 29, 2026
Merged

fix: replace blocked action in publish-netlify workflow#3115
svor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/publish-netlify-blocked-action

Conversation

@gtrivedi88
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Context

Same root cause as #3113. All runs of this workflow have failed since 2026-05-19.

Test plan

  • After merge, push a commit to an open PR and verify the Netlify preview deploys
  • Verify the sticky comment is updated with the preview URL

Related: CRW-11078

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The `actions-cool/maintain-one-comment@v3` repository was blocked by
GitHub for a TOS violation on 2026-05-19. This is the same issue fixed
in #3113 for preview-sticky-comment.yml — the publish-netlify workflow
also uses this action for the "Update status comment" step.

Replace with `marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@v2`.

Related: CRW-11078

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@gtrivedi88 gtrivedi88 requested review from a team, deerskindoll and mkuznyetsov as code owners May 29, 2026 10:50
@gtrivedi88 gtrivedi88 requested a review from nickboldt May 29, 2026 10:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚡️ Deploying pull request preview...

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 29, 2026

Click here to review and test in web IDE: Contribute

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@svor svor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@svor svor merged commit 08d6347 into main May 29, 2026
11 checks passed
@svor svor deleted the fix/publish-netlify-blocked-action branch May 29, 2026 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants