Issue labels check · Workflow runs · easyscience/dynamics-lib · GitHub

Actions

All workflows
Workflows
- Docs build and deployment Docs build and deployment
- Release PR (develop → master) Release PR (develop → master)
- Backmerge (master → develop) Backmerge (master → develop)
- Code and package tests Code and package tests
- Coverage checks Coverage checks
- Dashboard build and publish Dashboard build and publish
- Issue labels check Issue labels check
- Lint and format checks Lint and format checks
- Old workflow runs cleanup Old workflow runs cleanup
- pages-build-deployment pages-build-deployment
Management
- Caches
- Deployments

Issue labels check

Actions

Loading...
Loading

issues-labels.yml

58 workflow runs

58 workflow runs

Consider allowing users to add or remove coefficients in Polynomial Issue labels check #58: Issue #63 labeled by easyscience Bot

1s

1s

Consider allowing users to add or remove coefficients in Polynomial Issue labels check #57: Issue #63 labeled by easyscience Bot

1s

1s

SampleModel does not respect all parameter bounds Issue labels check #56: Issue #165 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

14s

14s

SampleModel does not respect all parameter bounds Issue labels check #55: Issue #165 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

2s

2s

SampleModel does not respect all parameter bounds Issue labels check #54: Issue #165 opened by henrikjacobsenfys

2s

2s

Allow settings to be passed to convolution Issue labels check #53: Issue #161 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

10s

10s

Allow settings to be passed to convolution Issue labels check #52: Issue #161 opened by henrikjacobsenfys

6s

6s

Allow settings to be passed to convolution Issue labels check #51: Issue #161 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

6s

6s

Detailed balancing is not implemented correctly Issue labels check #50: Issue #160 opened by henrikjacobsenfys

12s

12s

Detailed balancing is not implemented correctly Issue labels check #49: Issue #160 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

18s

18s

Detailed balancing is not implemented correctly Issue labels check #48: Issue #160 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

12s

12s

Rebinning data in analysis does not work Issue labels check #47: Issue #157 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

10s

10s

Rebinning data in analysis does not work Issue labels check #46: Issue #157 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

10s

10s

Rebinning data in analysis does not work Issue labels check #45: Issue #157 opened by henrikjacobsenfys

11s

11s

plot_data_and_model doesn't work for single Q data Issue labels check #44: Issue #156 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

12s

12s

plot_data_and_model doesn't work for single Q data Issue labels check #43: Issue #156 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

10s

10s

plot_data_and_model doesn't work for single Q data Issue labels check #42: Issue #156 opened by henrikjacobsenfys

11s

11s

Make ParameterAnalysis Issue labels check #41: Issue #154 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

9s

9s

Make ParameterAnalysis Issue labels check #40: Issue #154 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

13s

13s

Make ParameterAnalysis Issue labels check #39: Issue #154 opened by henrikjacobsenfys

9s

9s

Make it possible to plot components of the resolution Issue labels check #38: Issue #146 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

11s

11s

Make it possible to plot components of the resolution Issue labels check #37: Issue #146 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

13s

13s

Make it possible to plot components of the resolution Issue labels check #36: Issue #146 opened by henrikjacobsenfys

10s

10s

Consider moving unit checks to utils Issue labels check #35: Issue #73 unlabeled by henrikjacobsenfys

10s

10s

The area of the resolution does not get normalized Issue labels check #34: Issue #138 labeled by henrikjacobsenfys

9s

9s