docs: Document CS8080 private accessor override limitation

[Copilot]

CS8080 was nearly undocumented—the VS error link led to a "no specifics" page, and the existing docs entry didn't cover the common case that triggers it: a base property with a private accessor.

Changes

• property-declaration-errors.md — CS8080 bullet: Expanded the existing entry to explain that when the base class property has a private accessor (e.g., private set), an auto-implemented override is impossible because private members aren't accessible in derived classes. Adds explicit guidance to use explicit accessor bodies instead:

  class Base {
      public virtual int Member { get; private set; }
  }
  
  // ❌ CS8080 — auto-implemented can't satisfy the private set
  class Derived : Base {
      public override int Member { get; }
  }
  
  // ✅ Use explicit accessor body instead
  class Derived : Base {
      public override int Member { get => base.Member; }
  }

• Fixes Cannot override property with private set #27712

---

Internal previews

📄 File	🔗 Preview link
docs/csharp/language-reference/compiler-messages/property-declaration-errors.md	docs/csharp/language-reference/compiler-messages/property-declaration-errors

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because there is no eligible user to bill. To allow Copilot reviews on bot-authored pull requests, enable direct organization billing in your organization's Copilot settings.

[wadepickett]

Suggested change

- Include all accessors from the base property when overriding with an auto-implemented property (**CS8080**). Auto-implemented properties generate both storage and accessor implementations, so they must override all accessors present in the base class. If the base property has both `get` and `set`, the auto-implemented override must also have both. To override only specific accessors, implement the property with explicit accessor bodies and an explicit backing field instead of using auto-implementation. If the base class property has a `private` accessor, you can't override the property with an auto-implemented property—use explicit accessor bodies instead.

- Include all accessors from the base property when overriding with an auto-implemented property (**CS8080**). Auto-implemented properties generate both storage and accessor implementations, so they must override all accessors present in the base class. If the base property has both `get` and `set`, the auto-implemented override must also have both. To override only specific accessors, implement the property with explicit accessor bodies and an explicit backing field instead of using auto-implementation. If the base class property has a `private` accessor, you can't override the property with an auto-implemented property. Use explicit accessor bodies instead.

Very minor, removing the em dash that had no spaces around it and breaking into two sentances.

[wadepickett]

@adegeo : LGTM. I am not up on the technical aspect of this item. Good to have someone review that is. I"m not spotting a technical issue. I did see your note on your tests.

Approved, but see very minor suggestion. Watching for any need for a re-approve.