chore: Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 6: Workflow does not contain permissions

[chyroc]

Potential fix for https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-java/security/code-scanning/6

To fix the problem, add an explicit permissions block set to the least privilege at the job or workflow level.

• In general, this is best done at the top of the workflow for clarity and maintainability.
• In this workflow, adding permissions: contents: read at the root level ensures all jobs and steps only receive minimal access to repository contents via the GITHUB_TOKEN.
• The block should be inserted between the workflow name and the on: or after on:, before jobs:.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added a top-level permissions block to the GitHub Actions release workflow, setting contents: read. No other functional workflow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of Changes
GitHub Actions workflow .github/workflows/release.yml	Introduced top-level permissions with contents: read; existing on.push trigger and other workflow structure unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

In the burrow, I tweak with glee,
A tiny permit, light as a pea.
“Contents: read,” I softly say—
Carrots secured, on release day. 🥕
Hop, commit, sip thyme tea.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch alert-autofix-6

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

• Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

.github/workflows/release.yml (3)

13-13: Harden checkout by disabling token persistence.

Prevents accidental pushes using the job token.

Apply this diff:

-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false

---

11-11: Consider cheaper runner if macOS isn’t required.

ubuntu-latest is faster/cheaper and works for Java + GPG in most cases.

---

14-23: Future-proofing: OIDC-based publishing option.

If you migrate to OIDC for OSSRH/Maven Central, you’ll need permissions: id-token: write and can drop long-lived credentials.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffd3528 and 5b6335c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/release.yml (2)

2-3: Good fix: explicit least-privilege permissions added.

Top-level permissions: contents: read is appropriate here and should satisfy the code-scanning alert. No functional impact on the current steps.

---

25-31: Double-check if any step will create a GitHub Release or upload assets.

If you later add steps like release creation or asset upload, you’ll need contents: write (scoped at the job for least privilege). Current workflow (pure Maven deploy to OSSRH) does not require it.