[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/crate-ci/typos: v1.40.0 → v1
• github.com/rvben/rumdl-pre-commit: v0.0.192 → v0.0.194

---

Important

Update typos and rumdl-pre-commit hooks in .pre-commit-config.yaml to latest versions.

• Pre-commit Hook Updates:
  • Update typos hook from v1.40.0 to v1 in .pre-commit-config.yaml.
  • Update rumdl-pre-commit hook from v0.0.192 to v0.0.194 in .pre-commit-config.yaml.

^{This description was created by for cf509e1. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

Changed Files

File	Status
.pre-commit-config.yaml	0% smaller

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR contains only dependency version updates in pre-commit configuration, requiring no substantive code review

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to cf509e1 in 1 minute and 33 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 18 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. .pre-commit-config.yaml:15

• Draft comment:
  Consider pinning to a specific commit hash instead of using the tag 'v1' to ensure reproducible behavior.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is about a change that was made (v1.40.0 -> v1). However, the comment is suggesting a best practice (pinning to commit hash) rather than pointing out a clear bug or issue. The word "Consider" makes this a suggestion rather than identifying a definite problem. The PR author intentionally changed from a specific version to v1, so they may have had a reason. This feels like it's asking the author to reconsider their decision or explain their reasoning, which violates the rule about not asking for confirmation or explanation. It's also not a clear code change requirement - it's more of a "you should consider doing this differently" comment. The comment could be valid if using 'v1' is objectively problematic for pre-commit hooks and causes real reproducibility issues. Perhaps this is a well-known best practice in the pre-commit ecosystem that the author overlooked, making it a legitimate code quality suggestion. While pinning versions is generally good practice, the use of "Consider" makes this a suggestion rather than identifying a clear issue. The author deliberately changed to v1, and without strong evidence that this will cause problems, this comment is asking them to reconsider their intentional change rather than pointing out a definite bug. This comment should be deleted. It uses "Consider" which makes it a suggestion rather than identifying a clear issue. The author intentionally changed to v1, and the comment is essentially asking them to reconsider without showing strong evidence of a problem. This violates the rule about not making speculative comments and requiring clear code changes.

2. .pre-commit-config.yaml:19

• Draft comment:
  The update to v0.0.194 for rumdl-pre-commit appears fine; ensure no backward-incompatible changes are introduced.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_fg7K5Rq5RhrTpo7a

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}