Added MIT license - #2376
Conversation
nickanderson
left a comment
nickanderson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can see this matches core.
vpodzime
left a comment
vpodzime
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The commit message is misleading -- this adds the dual-license file, not GPLv3. I'd personally choose a different license here, but that's a separate discussion.
@vpodzime which one do you prefer ? |
AFAICT, the effects of GPL are basically void here because nobody is re-distributing this with their own changes. I'd go with the least restrictive option possible so MIT (or Apache 2.0 to align with some other repos we have). |
Signed-off-by: Lars Erik Wik <lars.erik.wik@northern.tech>
vpodzime
left a comment
vpodzime
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we also add a CLA? We shouldn't claim copyright for contributed code/changes otherwise.
| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | |||
| MIT License | |||
|
|
|||
| Copyright (c) 2026 Northern.tech | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have no copyright for this text. (I know we make this mistake in other repos)
3 participants
Signed-off-by: Lars Erik Wik lars.erik.wik@northern.tech