Skip to content

Moved to eslint v9, along with the most high impact changes#2631

Open
MomoRazor wants to merge 15 commits intomasterfrom
eslint-upgrade-2
Open

Moved to eslint v9, along with the most high impact changes#2631
MomoRazor wants to merge 15 commits intomasterfrom
eslint-upgrade-2

Conversation

@MomoRazor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A detailed explanation of this PR is found in this issue

@sentry
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sentry Bot commented Mar 22, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.72%. Comparing base (e724aca) to head (d41720d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2631      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.77%   76.72%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         300      300              
  Lines       22182    22175       -7     
  Branches     2232     2223       -9     
==========================================
- Hits        17030    17014      -16     
- Misses       5104     5113       +9     
  Partials       48       48              
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 99.63% <ø> (ø)
frontend 69.03% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
sharedComponents 68.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.


if (clicks.length > 0) {
const boxesCountTd = await screen.findByTestId("boxes-count", {}, { timeout: 15000 });
const boxesCountTd = await screen.findByTestId("boxes-count", {}, { timeout: 25000 });
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm hoping to have fixed that (once more) via #2643.
Just FYI because it'll conflict

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants