refactor: align template and typedef types as per convention - #582
Conversation
|
An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://582.graph.prtest3.cppalliance.org/libs/graph/doc/html/index.html If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL. 2026-08-31 19:00:16 UTC |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Boost dependency footprint vs Header-inclusion weights (graph files pulling each direct dependency in): No header-inclusion-weight changes. Transitive Boost modules: 66 → 66 (0) |
|
Compiler-warning counts vs
|
|
Thank you @andreacassioli for this nice renaming ! 🥳 PS: If you are looking for another modernization PR, there is a C++11 guard somewhere in this code: #if defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_ALLOCATOR)given we are C++14 that block can disappear 🎉 |
Good with me! I will make few more modernization when I have time (there also few more things like use |
|
Thanks for the improvement! |
Before submitting
developbranch.Type of change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
What this PR does
Motivation
I would like to help modernizing the RCSP code, and I noticed that the naming does not match the convention. It is a small first step in make the code easier to read and more modern.
Testing
Checklist
b2in thetest/directory).