Apply BitChoiceGroup improvements (#12740) - #12743
Open
msynk wants to merge 9 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (31)
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
WalkthroughBitChoiceGroup adds descriptions, autofocus, configurable gaps, expanded ARIA attributes, focusable native inputs, label positioning, suffix and title customization, synchronized selection state, updated styling, expanded demos, and comprehensive accessibility and behavior tests. ChangesChoiceGroup component and rendering
Demo coverage
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~60 minutes Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs`:
- Around line 374-397: Update SetInputElement’s AutoFocus branch to wrap
InputElement.FocusAsync() in defensive catches for InvalidOperationException and
JSException, preventing interop or disconnected-element failures from escaping
during rendering while preserving the existing autofocus conditions and state
updates.
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cs`:
- Around line 566-646: Update the second Small/Medium/Large trio in
example18RazorCode to match the live “ChoiceGroup with icon” demo: retain
Horizontal but remove Inline from each BitChoiceGroup declaration, leaving the
first inline trio unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d67c0345-34a4-4b60-8f99-9c941fefb8bb
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupClassStyles.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItem.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupNameSelectors.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOption.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/Order.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupTests.cs
Member
Author
|
@coderabbitai full-review |
|
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs (1)
376-396: 🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winAdd defensive exception handling for
FocusAsync.In Blazor, calling
FocusAsynccan throw anInvalidOperationException(if the element is disconnected before the call completes) or aJSException(if the interop fails, e.g., due to a closed circuit). It is highly recommended to wrapFocusAsyncin atry/catchblock to prevent unhandled exceptions from terminating the Blazor circuit during rendering.🛠️ Proposed fix
internal async Task SetInputElement(TItem item, ElementReference inputElement) { var isChecked = GetIsCheckedItem(item); if (isChecked is false) { if (_items.Any(GetIsCheckedItem)) return; if (ReferenceEquals(_items.FirstOrDefault(), item) is false) return; } InputElement = inputElement; if (AutoFocus && _autoFocusDone is false && IsEnabled && ReadOnly is false && GetIsEnabled(item)) { _autoFocusDone = true; - await InputElement.FocusAsync(); + try + { + await InputElement.FocusAsync(); + } + catch (Exception ex) when (ex is JSException || ex is InvalidOperationException) + { + // Ignore focus failures (e.g., element disconnected or hidden) + } } }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs` around lines 376 - 396, Update SetInputElement so the AutoFocus FocusAsync call is wrapped in defensive handling for InvalidOperationException and JSException, preventing disconnected-element or failed-interop errors from escaping during rendering while preserving the existing autofocus conditions and _autoFocusDone behavior.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Duplicate comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs`:
- Around line 376-396: Update SetInputElement so the AutoFocus FocusAsync call
is wrapped in defensive handling for InvalidOperationException and JSException,
preventing disconnected-element or failed-interop errors from escaping during
rendering while preserving the existing autofocus conditions and _autoFocusDone
behavior.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 621312aa-e975-4df1-a8af-117b126ddf09
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupClassStyles.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItem.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupNameSelectors.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOption.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/Order.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupTests.cs
Member
Author
|
@coderabbitai full-review |
|
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
Cyrus-Sushiant
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
Member
Author
|
@coderabbitai full-review |
|
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scss (1)
1-1: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low valueStylelint:
.scssextension in@import.Flagged by Stylelint (
scss/load-partial-extension). Since this convention likely repeats elsewhere in the codebase, consider a broader cleanup rather than a one-off fix here.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scss` at line 1, Remove the .scss extension from the `@import` in BitChoiceGroup styles, and apply the same extensionless partial-import convention to other SCSS imports in the affected codebase where applicable.Source: Linters/SAST tools
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs (1)
30-34: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winAutoFocus doc says "first item", but implementation skips disabled ones.
GetTabTargetItem()(Line 422) resolves to the first enabled item, falling back to the first item only when none are enabled. The XML doc here doesn't mention the "enabled" qualifier, which could mislead consumers about which item receives focus when the first item is disabled.📝 Proposed doc fix
/// <summary> - /// Determines if the ChoiceGroup is auto focused on first render, focusing its checked item (or its first item). + /// Determines if the ChoiceGroup is auto focused on first render, focusing its checked item (or its first enabled item). /// </summary> [Parameter] public bool AutoFocus { get; set; }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs` around lines 30 - 34, Update the AutoFocus XML documentation to state that first render focuses the checked item, or the first enabled item when no checked item is available, with the existing fallback behavior for all-disabled groups reflected accurately. Keep the implementation, parameter, and GetTabTargetItem() behavior unchanged.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs`:
- Around line 30-34: Update the AutoFocus XML documentation to state that first
render focuses the checked item, or the first enabled item when no checked item
is available, with the existing fallback behavior for all-disabled groups
reflected accurately. Keep the implementation, parameter, and GetTabTargetItem()
behavior unchanged.
In `@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scss`:
- Line 1: Remove the .scss extension from the `@import` in BitChoiceGroup styles,
and apply the same extensionless partial-import convention to other SCSS imports
in the affected codebase where applicable.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dbcaec9c-9a44-490e-ae98-ceb340cb9601
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupClassStyles.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItem.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupNameSelectors.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOption.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/Order.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupAccessibilityTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItemContentTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOptionsApiTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOptionsTest.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupStateTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupStyleClassTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupUncontrolledOptionsTest.razor
Member
Author
|
@coderabbitai full-review |
|
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs (1)
31-35: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winAutoFocus doc doesn't match actual targeting behavior.
Doc says autofocus lands on the checked item "or its first item", but
GetTabTargetItem()(Line 468) actually picks the first enabled item, falling back to the first item only when none are enabled. Worth tightening the wording so consumers aren't surprised when a disabled first item is skipped.📝 Proposed doc fix
/// <summary> - /// Determines if the ChoiceGroup is auto focused on first render, focusing its checked item (or its first item). + /// Determines if the ChoiceGroup is auto focused on first render, focusing its checked item (or its first enabled item, when none is checked). /// </summary> [Parameter] public bool AutoFocus { get; set; }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs` around lines 31 - 35, Update the AutoFocus XML documentation to accurately describe that focus targets the first enabled item, falling back to the first item only when no enabled items exist; ensure the wording remains consistent with GetTabTargetItem().src/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cs (1)
133-148: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winThe autofocus tests only count focus interop calls, not the target.
BitChoiceGroupShouldAutoFocusTheFirstEnabledItemWhenNothingIsCheckedwould pass even if the focus landed on the disabled first input — exactly the regression the comment says it guards against. Consider asserting on the invocation arguments (the element reference / id) so the intended target is actually verified.Also applies to: 163-166
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cs` around lines 133 - 148, Update BitChoiceGroupShouldAutoFocusTheFirstEnabledItemWhenNothingIsChecked and the related test at the alternate location to assert the focus interop invocation targets the first enabled item, using its element reference or id, rather than only checking FocusInvocationCount(). Preserve the existing setup and ensure the disabled first item is not the autofocus target.src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor (1)
32-42: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low valueGuidance contradicts the sample data.
The lead says images are decorative and
ImageAltshould only be set "when the picture says something the text does not", butimageItems/inlineImageItemsset placeholder alts like"alt for Bar image", which duplicates the item text. Consider droppingImageAltfrom these demo items (or using it on just one item to illustrate the exception) so the example matches the advice.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor` around lines 32 - 42, Align the demo data used by imageItems and inlineImageItems with the accessibility guidance by removing placeholder ImageAlt values that duplicate each item’s text. Leave ImageAlt set only on an item where the image conveys information not present in the label, if demonstrating that exception is needed.src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor (1)
22-22: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low valueProse mixes "item" and "option" on the options page.
These rewritten leads say "items" while the rest of this page (and the rendered API,
BitChoiceGroupOption) says "options" — e.g. line 22 "individual items", line 47 "the item is checked … the item text", line 108 "Lays out the items in a row". Same wording appears at lines 566, 762 and 856. Worth normalizing to "option" except where the text names an actual parameter (ItemTemplate,ItemPrefixTemplate, per-itemStyle/Class).Also applies to: 47-47, 108-108
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor` at line 22, Normalize the prose in _BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo to use “option” instead of “item” when referring to ChoiceGroup options, including the descriptions around the disabled state, checked state/text, and layout. Preserve “item” only when it names actual API parameters such as ItemTemplate, ItemPrefixTemplate, or per-item Style/Class, and apply the same wording consistently to the other noted occurrences.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs`:
- Around line 451-466: Add defensive exception handling around FocusAsync in
SetInputElement, catching the expected JSException and InvalidOperationException
so failures from disconnected elements or closed circuits do not propagate to
the caller. Preserve the existing autofocus conditions and _autoFocusDone state
behavior.
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cs`:
- Around line 555-556: Correct the copied Razor sample in example20RazorCode by
inserting a space between the Label attribute and DefaultValue attribute,
keeping the rest of the BitChoiceGroup example unchanged.
---
Nitpick comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs`:
- Around line 31-35: Update the AutoFocus XML documentation to accurately
describe that focus targets the first enabled item, falling back to the first
item only when no enabled items exist; ensure the wording remains consistent
with GetTabTargetItem().
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor`:
- Around line 32-42: Align the demo data used by imageItems and inlineImageItems
with the accessibility guidance by removing placeholder ImageAlt values that
duplicate each item’s text. Leave ImageAlt set only on an item where the image
conveys information not present in the label, if demonstrating that exception is
needed.
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor`:
- Line 22: Normalize the prose in _BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo to use “option”
instead of “item” when referring to ChoiceGroup options, including the
descriptions around the disabled state, checked state/text, and layout. Preserve
“item” only when it names actual API parameters such as ItemTemplate,
ItemPrefixTemplate, or per-item Style/Class, and apply the same wording
consistently to the other noted occurrences.
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cs`:
- Around line 133-148: Update
BitChoiceGroupShouldAutoFocusTheFirstEnabledItemWhenNothingIsChecked and the
related test at the alternate location to assert the focus interop invocation
targets the first enabled item, using its element reference or id, rather than
only checking FocusInvocationCount(). Preserve the existing setup and ensure the
disabled first item is not the autofocus target.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: a55cbb71-16b8-42d6-96bc-e668b3c64d36
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupClassStyles.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItem.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupNameSelectors.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOption.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/Order.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupAccessibilityTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItemContentTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOptionsApiTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOptionsTest.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupStateTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupStyleClassTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupUncontrolledOptionsTest.razor
Member
Author
|
@coderabbitai full-review |
|
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs (1)
452-467: 🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winStill missing defensive exception handling around
FocusAsync.This was flagged on two prior commits and remains unresolved.
await InputElement.FocusAsync();can throwJSException/JSDisconnectedException/InvalidOperationException(disconnected element, closed circuit, prerendering, etc.), and since_BitChoiceGroupItem.razor.cs'sOnAfterRenderAsyncawaits this method unguarded, an uncaught exception here will propagate out of the render lifecycle and can crash the circuit. The file already uses a similar guarded pattern for JS interop elsewhere (seeOnAfterRenderAsync's reorder call catchingJSDisconnectedException/JSException).🛠️ Proposed fix
if (AutoFocus && _autoFocusDone is false && IsEnabled && ReadOnly is false && GetIsEnabled(item)) { _autoFocusDone = true; - await InputElement.FocusAsync(); + try + { + await InputElement.FocusAsync(); + } + catch (Exception ex) when (ex is JSException || ex is JSDisconnectedException || ex is InvalidOperationException) + { + // Ignore focus failures (e.g., element disconnected, circuit closed, or invalid element ref) + } }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs` around lines 452 - 467, Wrap the InputElement.FocusAsync call in SetInputElement with defensive exception handling for JSDisconnectedException, JSException, and InvalidOperationException, matching the existing guarded JS interop pattern in OnAfterRenderAsync. Ensure these expected lifecycle failures are handled locally so they do not propagate through the render lifecycle.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cs (1)
121-132: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winAssert which input got focused. The test name says "the checked item", but only the invocation count is checked — it would pass if the first item were focused.
FocusedElementId()is already available.💚 Proposed tightening
- RenderComponent<BitChoiceGroup<BitChoiceGroupItem<string>, string>>(parameters => + var component = RenderComponent<BitChoiceGroup<BitChoiceGroupItem<string>, string>>(parameters => { parameters.Add(p => p.Items, GetItems()); parameters.Add(p => p.DefaultValue, "B"); parameters.Add(p => p.AutoFocus, true); }); Assert.AreEqual(1, FocusInvocationCount()); + Assert.AreEqual(component.FindAll(".bit-chg-icn input")[1].GetAttribute("blazor:elementreference"), FocusedElementId());🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cs` around lines 121 - 132, Strengthen BitChoiceGroupShouldAutoFocusTheCheckedItem by asserting that FocusedElementId() matches the input associated with the checked/default-value item "B", in addition to the existing FocusInvocationCount assertion. Use the existing item identifiers from GetItems() rather than only verifying that some input received focus.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs`:
- Around line 154-172: Add an explicit changelog or migration note for the
removed BitChoiceGroup Reversed parameter, documenting its replacement with
LabelPosition and specifying that Reversed=true in horizontal choice groups maps
to the corresponding LabelPosition value. Reference the BitChoiceGroup API and
preserve the migration guidance for existing bindings.
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor`:
- Around line 313-314: Update the Prefix description in
_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor at lines 313-314 and
_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor at lines 196-197 to state that Prefix renders
before the item text inside the item label, replacing the inaccurate “in front
of the radio circle” wording while keeping both pages consistent.
---
Duplicate comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs`:
- Around line 452-467: Wrap the InputElement.FocusAsync call in SetInputElement
with defensive exception handling for JSDisconnectedException, JSException, and
InvalidOperationException, matching the existing guarded JS interop pattern in
OnAfterRenderAsync. Ensure these expected lifecycle failures are handled locally
so they do not propagate through the render lifecycle.
---
Nitpick comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cs`:
- Around line 121-132: Strengthen BitChoiceGroupShouldAutoFocusTheCheckedItem by
asserting that FocusedElementId() matches the input associated with the
checked/default-value item "B", in addition to the existing FocusInvocationCount
assertion. Use the existing item identifiers from GetItems() rather than only
verifying that some input received focus.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 66a0f41d-3608-41de-bc33-3cb37def787d
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupClassStyles.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItem.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupNameSelectors.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOption.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItem.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupDemo.razor.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/Order.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupAccessibilityTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupEventsTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupItemContentTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOptionsApiTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupOptionsTest.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupStateTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupStyleClassTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupTests.cssrc/BlazorUI/Tests/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroupUncontrolledOptionsTest.razor
Member
Author
|
@coderabbitai re-review |
…into 12740-blazorui-choicegroup-improvements
|
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cs (1)
526-546: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low value
DescriptionTemplatesnippet references.custom-descriptionwithout defining it.Other template examples in this file ship an inline
<style>block; this one doesn't, so copy-pasting yields unstyled markup.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cs` around lines 526 - 546, Update the example16RazorCode sample to include an inline style definition for the custom-description class used by DescriptionTemplate, matching the pattern of the other styled template examples while preserving the existing markup and behavior.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scss`:
- Around line 214-216: Insert a blank line immediately before the comment
describing the focus ring in the ChoiceGroup styles, without changing the
comment or surrounding selectors.
---
Nitpick comments:
In
`@src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cs`:
- Around line 526-546: Update the example16RazorCode sample to include an inline
style definition for the custom-description class used by DescriptionTemplate,
matching the pattern of the other styled template examples while preserving the
existing markup and behavior.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: c8a18261-e55c-4a39-9c6c-8c9fe9e9f0ac
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cssrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.scsssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor.samples.cssrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razorsrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupItemDemo.razor
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupOptionDemo.razor.samples.cs
- src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/BitChoiceGroup.razor.cs
- src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Inputs/ChoiceGroup/_BitChoiceGroupCustomDemo.razor.samples.cs
Member
Author
|
@coderabbitai full-review |
|
Action performedFull review triggered. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #12740
Summary by CodeRabbit
altis always present.