This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 20, 2025. It is now read-only.
Open
Conversation
Since the main pip package suggests the latest MXNet version, the containers should be on par
Author
|
As this is my first contribution here, I didn't want to make a mess :) But I think that the Dockerfile would be simpler if it pulled from Python instead of Ubuntu. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #, if available:
No issue is open...
Description of changes:
Update MXNet version to 1.6 on 2 Dockerfiles CPU and GPU.
The PIP package already suggest the latest version of MXNet.
This only to keep the containers and non Docker installations the same.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.