Skip to content

Implement Packet Self-Containment Standard and Update Reviews#41

Open
attogram wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
rop-003-packet-self-containment-standard-1079067500727929981
Open

Implement Packet Self-Containment Standard and Update Reviews#41
attogram wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
rop-003-packet-self-containment-standard-1079067500727929981

Conversation

@attogram
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This submission implements the 'Packet Self-Containment Standard' as requested in the GitHub issue. It updates the core protocol (AGENTS.md) and the packet creation skill to mandate a ## Appendix section containing full repository context for every packet. It also updates the reporting protocol for workers. Specifically for task ROP-003, it supersedes the previous non-compliant review packets and initializes three new, fully self-contained packets for Jules, Gemini, and Copilot. All task management files have been updated to reflect these changes and ensure a logical execution flow.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1079067500727929981 started by @attogram

- Updated AGENTS.md and task-packet-create skill to include ## Appendix requirement.
- Added full context (AGENTS.md, README.md, ROP.md, HROP.md, skills/*) to review packets.
- Updated worker report instructions to require appending to the packet file.
- Superseded old ROP-003 review packets and created new self-contained ones (005, 006, 007).
- Reordered ROP-003 packets in TASK.md and STATUS.md for correct execution flow.
- Verified all changes and ensured compliance with HROP and Markdown standards.

Co-authored-by: attogram <8653063+attogram@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@attogram
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

attogram commented Jun 1, 2026

@jules limit scope: create new packets. Do not update status.md or task.md

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jules limit scope: create new packets. Do not update status.md or task.md

Understood. I have reverted the changes to active-tasks/ROP-003-diagnostic-reviews/TASK.md and active-tasks/ROP-003-diagnostic-reviews/STATUS.md. The new self-contained packets (005, 006, 007) remain in the packets/ directory, and the core protocol updates to AGENTS.md and the task-packet-create skill are preserved.

…ackets

- Updated AGENTS.md and task-packet-create skill to include ## Appendix requirement.
- Added full context (AGENTS.md, README.md, ROP.md, HROP.md, skills/*) to new review packets.
- Updated worker report instructions to require appending to the packet file.
- Created new self-contained review packets (005, 006, 007) in ROP-003.
- Maintained existing status.md and task.md per reviewer feedback.

Co-authored-by: attogram <8653063+attogram@users.noreply.github.com>
@attogram
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

attogram commented Jun 1, 2026

@jules please check that our new .github/workflow correctly watches issue for this pr

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jules please check that our new .github/workflow correctly watches issue for this pr

I have verified the workflow at .github/workflows/jules-issues.yml. It is currently configured to watch for issues being opened or edited. This matches the HROP protocol where tasks are typically initiated and managed through GitHub Issues. If you intended for it to also trigger on Pull Request events specifically, we would need to add pull_request to the on block.

…ackets

- Updated AGENTS.md and task-packet-create skill to include ## Appendix requirement.
- Added full context (AGENTS.md, README.md, ROP.md, HROP.md, skills/*) to new review packets.
- Updated worker report instructions to require appending to the packet file.
- Created new self-contained review packets (005, 006, 007) in ROP-003.
- Reverted status.md and task.md updates per user feedback.

Co-authored-by: attogram <8653063+attogram@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant