Merged
Conversation
Xuanwo
previously approved these changes
Oct 28, 2025
Member
|
Thank you for this! The only thing left is to resolve the conflicts. |
kevinjqliu
force-pushed
the
kevinjqliu/unpin-pydantic
branch
from
1a091c9 to
5bcfdf8
Compare
Xuanwo
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2025
Member
|
This should be simple change, let's just merge. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
What changes are included in this PR?
Revert of #1737
pydantic release a fix in 2.12.3 which will be automatically used by resolver (see simliar in pyiceberg, apache/iceberg-python#2635)
Are these changes tested?