Conversation
Generated-by: ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 Sol)
Tsien4763
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 17, 2026 06:41
Contributor
|
Can you update the description as per the guidelines. |
Contributor
Generated-by: ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 Sol)
Author
|
Updated the PR description per the template and folded in the remaining applicable doesn't exists occurrences. The PR now covers 7 occurrences across documentation, comments/JavaDoc, tests, and user-facing messages. Thanks for pointing these out. |
dylanhz
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2026
dylanhz
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @Tsien4763. LGTM.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

What is the purpose of the change
This pull request fixes the grammatical typo
doesn't existstodoesn't existacross the remaining applicable occurrences in Flink documentation, JavaDoc/comments, and user-facing error messages.Brief change log
Verifying this change
This change is a trivial text-only rework without test coverage. It does not change program behavior. The existing Azure CI is used to verify the branch.
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
@Public(Evolving): noDocumentation
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 Sol)