Repository navigation
Support equality with one in opt-in WindowTopN rule #26160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
osipovartem
wants to merge
5
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
Embucket:upstream-window-topn-eq-one
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
76194d5
Support equality with one in opt-in WindowTopN rule
osipovartem df38616
test: assert equality TopK plans for all ranking functions
osipovartem 60e118b
Merge branch 'main' into upstream-window-topn-eq-one
osipovartem 0341c23
Merge branch 'main' into upstream-window-topn-eq-one
osipovartem c9811ab
Merge branch 'main' into upstream-window-topn-eq-one
osipovartem File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Optional: Could we add compact EXPLAIN checks for the new ROW_NUMBER and DENSE_RANK equality cases, asserting the corresponding PartitionedTopKExec function and
fetch=1? Their result tests would also pass without the optimization, while the current positive plan assertion covers only RANK.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added in df38616: physical-only EXPLAIN checks for ROW_NUMBER and DENSE_RANK, including the function and fetch=1. The setting is restored afterwards. The focused file and full extended suite pass locally.