⚡ Bolt: Optimize schedule filtering with Set lookup#232
Conversation
Convert the savedSessionIds array to a Set before performing lookups inside the filter loop to reduce time complexity from O(N*M) to O(N+M). Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Qodo reviews are paused for this user.Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more → On a Teams plan? Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center? |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesSession Filtering Performance
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request optimizes the session filtering logic in ScheduleContainer.tsx by converting the savedSessionIds array into a Set, which improves the lookup complexity from O(N) to O(1). The reviewer suggests further improving this by storing the IDs as a Set directly within the ScheduleContext to avoid recreating the Set on every render and to provide performance benefits to other components that consume this data.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const filterSessions = (sessions: GridSession[]) => sessions.filter((s) => savedSessionIds.includes(s.id) || s.isServiceSession); | ||
| const savedSessionIdsSet = new Set(savedSessionIds); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this local optimization correctly reduces the filtering complexity from O(N*M) to O(N+M), consider storing savedSessionIds as a Set directly within the ScheduleContext. This would eliminate the need to recreate the Set on every re-render of this component and would also optimize the isSaved check (currently O(N) in the context) for all components consuming it, such as SessionCard.
💡 What: Converted the
savedSessionIdsarray into aSetoutside of the session filtering loops inScheduleContainer.tsx.🎯 Why: The original code used
Array.includes()inside anArray.filter()method. This resulted in O(N*M) time complexity, where N is the number of saved sessions and M is the total number of sessions. Using aSetbrings the complexity down to O(N+M) becauseSet.has()has O(1) time complexity.📊 Impact: Reduces CPU time when re-rendering the schedule grid when a user clicks the "My Schedule" button, especially when many sessions are loaded or saved.
🔬 Measurement: Verify by rendering the schedule grid with a large mock dataset of
DailyScheduleentries and a large list ofsavedSessionIds, observing the time required to switch to "My Schedule" view.PR created automatically by Jules for task 4801011960425649429 started by @anyulled
Summary by CodeRabbit