test: characterize orchestration security surfaces (dseg slice 1)#193
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 94ab3a86af
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
0ae45c7 to
021daa1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 021daa1a58
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
1 participant
Slice 1 of the data-segregation workstream: a table-driven 15-row security characterization matrix over real HTTP, WS RPC, asset, MCP, auth, filesystem/VCS/worktree, and worker-process seams. No behavior or domain changes; this pins the CURRENT access surface so later slices (starting with the fail-closed project
dataAudiencefield in #192) diff against proven baselines.Sequencing: lands BEFORE #192 (slice 2).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code