Repository navigation
Conversation
…egyPollutionTest Follow-up to agentic-ai-java#115: the new test file was added without the standard Apache 2.0 license header, which the post-merge License Check (skywalking-eyes) flags. Header copied verbatim from existing test files.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #115: the new test file
CloneStateKeyStrategyPollutionTest.javawas added without the standard Apache 2.0 license header, which the post-merge
License Check (skywalking-eyes) flags on
main.This PR adds the header verbatim (byte-identical to the headers of existing
source files).
Side note for triage: the
api-compatibilityjob failure in the Build and Testworkflow predates #115 — run #73 on
e24b998(the base commit of #115) alreadyfailed, while
ac5343fwas still green on Oct 5. #115 only changes constructorbodies with no API-signature changes, so that failure looks related to the
baseline comparison introduced around
e24b998(japicmp baselinee3de871),not to this change. Posting here in case it helps narrow it down.