review(OPE-7): n-queens adversarial review — APPROVE WITH RESIDUALS - #7
Open
agentforce314 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
agentforce314 wants to merge 1 commit into
agentforce314 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…LOG.md f₂ erratum - ADVERSARIAL_REVIEW.md: fresh rebuild (Built, not Replayed), own #print axioms, keyword grep, cold read of NonAttacking, negative controls per clause, deviations (a)/(b) confirmed, hypothesis diff table, scope/claim posture, machine-trust boundary, 8 residual risks. Verdict: APPROVE WITH RESIDUALS. - review_checks.lean + .out: scratch file run with lake env lean (exit 0). - review_check_f2.py: LOG typed ℕ-form vs signed vs Lean form, 8<=n<=1000. No claim. Artifact reviewed: origin/ope/6-nqueens-proof @ 8ae158a. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adversarial Reviewer deliverable for OPE-7 (parent OPE-2). Reviews
origin/ope/6-nqueens-proof@8ae158a(ProofLab/NQueensTheorem.lean, PR #6). Do not merge — board merges.Verdict: APPROVE WITH RESIDUALS. No claim (known-classical; deliverable is the machine-checked artifact).
✔ [2240/2240] Built ProofLab.NQueensTheorem, exit 0, Lean 4.10.0.#print axioms:n_queens_exists_iff→[propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound];queens_exists_of_four_le→[propext, Quot.sound]. NosorryAx, noofReduceBool.NonAttackingread cold: rows/colsFin n, injective columns, both diagonal families over ℕ (not mod n). Negative controls for each clause rejected; weakened predicates accept them (each clause load-bearing).n = 0convention consistent across STATEMENT.md / header / docstring.f₂truncates on one row of everyn ≡ 2 (mod 6)board (166/166, Python); Lean form agrees with the signed form everywhere. Erratum forLOG.md— to fix at close-out.e2_no_fixneeds4 ≤ n(n = 2counterexample); assembly supplies it. Full hypothesis diff table; nothing else changed.verify_construction.py. Scope (b)–(e) marked out of scope; no novelty language in PRs OPE-3: n-queens fresh Scout dossier + Level B statement pin (board-named) #3–formalist(OPE-6): n-queens namesake theorem, zero sorry (supersedes #4) #6.IsNQueens↔NonAttackingbridge, toolchain trust, LOG erratum.Files
attacks/n-queens-20260912-180329/ADVERSARIAL_REVIEW.md— the verdictreview_checks.lean/review_checks.out— scratch checks,lake env leanexit 0review_check_f2.py— deviation (a) checkVerify
Paperclip: OPE-7.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code