Fix Store package runtime layout - #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Root cause
The Store packaging target included the regular .NET apphost while single-file publish metadata excluded
CodexUsageDock.dllandCodexUsageDock.runtimeconfig.json. The resulting MSIX passed the previous runtime-file checks but failed before managed code started because the apphost could not find its managed entry assembly.Impact
Store packages now remain a single MSIX installation unit for users while carrying an explicit, verifiable app-local .NET layout internally. Incomplete packages matching the Partner Center crash signature are rejected during the release build.
Validation
0.5.1.msixuploadinspected: both packages contain the managed entry assembly, deps file, runtimeconfig,System.Private.CoreLib, and native host/runtime filesgit diff --checkpassedLocal development registration could not be refreshed because Windows reported a conflicting unpackaged installation under another user (
0x80073D19). Manual Command Palette reload verification therefore remains outstanding.