-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
Precalculus PR Accessibility #919
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://22553080.tbil.pages.dev
|
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://7e736ba6.tbil.pages.dev
|
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://8e3d3fdd.tbil.pages.dev
|
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://c2d41de8.tbil.pages.dev
|
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://e77033f1.tbil.pages.dev
|
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://71425450.tbil.pages.dev
|
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://e6d02e40.tbil.pages.dev
|
|
In [Activity 4.1.15 |
|
General question: do we want to provide more of an explanation of the graph? Like for for many of these answers, the speech says, "A graph of a parabola." Is the goal to say something like "a graph of a parabola that opens upward with a vertex at (x,y) and an axis of symmetry at x=#"? If so, I can put in the suggestions, but I wasn't sure what the goal is for this round of edits. |
I believe newer Prefigure versions take care of this |
This is a great question and the answer is "it depends". So the point of the whole annotation tree is to give all of that information. I think that the first level ( |
🚀 Preview available 🚀https://05e6b36b.tbil.pages.dev
|
Addresses #898 . Converts images in PR module to Prefigure