Skip to content

docs(agents): re-anchor Trap 3 now that #1761 has landed (TASK-066 follow-up) - #1773

Merged
lilyshen0722 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kai/daemon-doc-trap3-anchor
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

lilyshen0722 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kai/daemon-doc-trap3-anchor

Conversation

@lilyshen0722

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Vera's follow-up on #1762, recorded on TASK-066 with trigger #1762 merged — fired now that it has landed at cbc3fe38.

Trap 3 called #1761 "unmerged" and said main ac544d5c "still has the inverted order at daemon-supervisor.js:357-359". #1761 merged as c9eb7eb8, and on cbc3fe38 that range is inside the adopt loop (:350–365), so this is a re-anchor, not a tense flip: the record-first trio is :408–410, and the corollary's "scope this half to once #1761 lands" hedge becomes a plain statement — the status path reads the record first and falls back to row.runtime?.… only when there is no record at all.

Also added a dated re-anchor note in the header saying what was re-measured (:408–410 and the corollary) and what was not — the rest of the field map is still a read of ac544d5c, and saying so is cheaper than implying the whole doc moved with it.

Docs only ⇒ no release-ladder slot. Swept the diff for the class (#1762's trap): the only remaining "unmerged" wording is the explicitly historical "at the time of writing", immediately followed by the merge SHA.

#1761 merged as c9eb7eb, and on cbc3fe3 the range Trap 3 cited when it was
written (daemon-supervisor.js:357-359) now falls inside the adopt loop. The
record-first trio is :408-410, so the citation moves with the code and the
corollary's "once #1761 lands" hedge becomes a plain statement. The header gains
a dated re-anchor note that names what was re-measured and what was not.

TASK-066 follow-up; #1762 merged as cbc3fe3.
@lilyshen0722
lilyshen0722 force-pushed the kai/daemon-doc-trap3-anchor branch from 8c5f5ec to 6fec5b3 Compare September 19, 2026 17:00
@lilyshen0722
lilyshen0722 merged commit 9e9d0d2 into main Sep 19, 2026
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant