Improve Python comments filtering

[Vladyslav-Kuksiuk]

This PR improves Python comments filtering.

Resolves this issue.

[Oleg-Melnik]

Claude Review

LGTM — nothing blocking found.

Checked and confirmed clean:

• Escapes: true is correct for Python, including the raw-string trap: even in r"""...""", the tokenizer treats backslash-quote as non-terminating (the backslash stays in the value), so escape-skipping in textBlockEnd matches CPython's lexing for both regular and raw triple-quoted strings.
• Prefixed literals (f, r, b, rb, …) work by construction: prefix letters fall through as code bytes and the """/''' delimiter still matches at the quote position.
• Scan order: text blocks are consumed before single quotes, so ''' wins over ''+', and inline # is checked after strings — # inside any string form is preserved, while ''' inside a # comment doesn't open a phantom block.
• The escaped-delimiter test traces correctly: """a\"""" — open (3) + a + escaped \" + close (3) consumes exactly the literal, leaving the trailing comment to be stripped.
• Right altitude: reuses the TextBlockMarker mechanism from Improve Go comments filtering #94 instead of adding a fourth bespoke lexer; YAML/shell keep hashLineSyntax untouched.

One informational limitation, not a blocker: since Python 3.12 (PEP 701), a multi-line f-string can contain real # comments inside its {...} expression holes, e.g.

message = f"""
Total: {
    compute_total(items)  # real comment
}
"""

The filter treats the whole triple-quoted region as opaque text, so such a comment is kept instead of stripped. The failure direction is safe — extra text survives, string content is never corrupted, and the block still closes at the right delimiter — and handling it would require f-string-aware interpolation lexing (as done for C#). Fine to leave as a documented limitation until someone actually hits it.

[Oleg-Melnik]

@Vladyslav-Kuksiuk LGTM with comment from Claude.