simplify filenames

[fkr]

No description provided.

[jklare]

I think we should not rename the file that was approved by the last project board, at least I do not see any reason to. For the new one, we might want to rename it to be more clear about the term, but then we should be very explicit about it imho.

[fkr]

I came across this while documenting the naming of the file in SCS-0005 and since the file starts with the date when the term starts (since with Kurt’s recent change it is documented in SCS-0005 that the term is the calendar year), mentioning the year twice seems redundant.
As for the renaming: the history is visible in git so I see no reason that speaks against renaming such a file.

[matofeder]

LGTM, Just please ensure that references to the new name work here and there.