RU-T47 Build fix

[ucswift]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated release process version numbering format to follow semantic versioning standards (e.g., 7.123.0 instead of 7.123).

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CI/CD workflow configuration to update the package.json version format by appending a ".0" suffix to the version string in two jq operations within the GitHub Actions workflow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CI/CD Workflow Version Formatting .github/workflows/react-native-cicd.yml	Updated jq operations to change version format from 7.${{ github.run_number }} to 7.${{ github.run_number }}.0 in two occurrences, adding a patch version component to the package.json version string

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• CU-8687aj3gt More ios build changes #157 — Also modifies version/tag handling in the same CI/CD workflow, adjusting version string formatting
• Develop #167 — Modifies versioning in the same workflow file to align release notes with the version format

Suggested reviewers

• github-actions

Poem

🐰 A tiny tweak, a dot and zero,
Our version now's a proper hero!
Semantic versioning takes the stage,
Seven point run number—now that's the rage!
Simple changes, clean and bright,
The workflow's heart beats just right ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'RU-T47 Build fix' is vague and does not clearly indicate what specific build issue is being resolved or what change was made to fix it.	Use a more descriptive title that explains the specific build issue, such as 'Fix version format in CI/CD workflow for package.json' to clarify the nature of the build fix.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[ucswift]

Approve

[github-actions]

This PR is approved.