Repository navigation
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Generated via commit 4dc8c82 Download link for the artifact containing the test results: ↓ atime-results.zip
|
| GITHUB_PAT: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | ||
| repo_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: Anirban166/Autocomment-atime-results@v1.4.3 No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IIUC this is designed to supplant the old action which can't be updated? Is there anything stopping us from forking it instead (or, if the current PR is intended as such a fork, could we at least host it in a dedicated repo under Rdatatable or maybe under your tdhock?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
right, the current PR is a fork. @Anirban166 would you consider putting this new code in your Autocomment-atime-results repo? (I was not sure if Ani is willing / able to continue maintenance, but that would be great)
The basic problem with the old action is that is uses an old cml container, old compilers, and this PR fixes that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
as I suspected, Ani is not super active these days.
Would be nice to run atime ci for prs like #7907
I would suggest we merge this PR now, and we can maybe move it to a dedicated repo later, Is that Ok?
|
hi @MichaelChirico @aitap can you please approve this PR? |
|
Thanks @tdhock! I had just peeked yesterday and saw it was marked draft. I'll take a look now. |
This reverts commit e1fa82b.
4dc8c82 to
b2d3a5e
Compare
|
Hey Toby, I had a look and was puzzled by the level of complexity in the proposed GHA. I am not super familiar with those tools, so I had a few LLMs review the proposal:
Where it came up with a number of concerns: Bugs & Edge Cases
Redundancies & Canonicality
And it came up with #7921 as a proposed iteration based on this feedback. I find the switch to use the supported |

The old atime CI uses an old container (old compilers etc.)
I propose switching to this new CI which is definitely more code.
Plus: easier to customize.
Minus: more maintenance burden.