fix(ci): pr-review-enforcement — downgrade setFailed to warning so check always passes#93
fix(ci): pr-review-enforcement — downgrade setFailed to warning so check always passes#93cryptoxdog wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…s green, still reports)
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 5 minutes and 49 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
✅ PR size is within recommended limits |
|
PR #93 Review: fix(ci): pr-review-enforcement — downgrade setFailed to warning so check always passesAuthor: cryptoxdog DescriptionChangeIn Beforeif (shouldFail) {
core.setFailed('PR exceeds size policy limits');
}Afterif (shouldFail) {
core.warning('PR exceeds size policy limits — consider splitting this PR');
// core.setFailed() removed: check always passes, report comment still posted
}WhyLarge infra/audit PRs legitimately exceed the default 1000-line threshold. The report comment still posts so reviewers see the size — it just no longer blocks the merge. IgorBot · 2026-04-01 CommitsChanged Files📦 Config (1 files)
Automated AnalysisDiff Findings✅ No issues found in diff analysis Test CoverageTest coverage looks adequate for changed files. Local LintSkipped (repo not checked out locally or linters not found). Summary✅ LOOKS GOOD — No automated issues found. Ready for human review. Automated PR review • 2026-04-21 18:08 |
|
Automated PR patrol review — 2026-04-22 UTC Patrol note only; not a human approval. This PR has been open for 501.3h with no review.
Top findings:
Suggested next action: fix failing CI, then request review . |
1 participant
Change
In
.github/workflows/pr-review-enforcement.yml, replacecore.setFailed()withcore.warning()so the PR size check always passes green while still posting the size report comment on every PR.Before
After
Why
Large infra/audit PRs legitimately exceed the default 1000-line threshold. The report comment still posts so reviewers see the size — it just no longer blocks the merge.
IgorBot · 2026-04-01