Unify workload selection for startup and distributed publication - #518
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before this PR
Canonical startup searched workload cohorts, while compile-and-publish independently selected each query. The two production adapters could diverge.
After this PR
Both adapters use one Planner workload-search boundary and preserve all canonical root identities. Accuracy requirements remain cohort-specific. Certificate-bearing roots remain query-scoped: a certificate is not copied to other roots merely because its numeric values match. Physical compilation still owns binding and deployment validation.
Verification
645 control-plane library tests pass; the prior full package run also passed 28 binary tests and one integration test. Production-process compatibility and distributed publication tests validate the entrypoints. Mapping rejection and shared query identity have focused coverage.
Stacked on #517. Complete workload-wide physical cost evidence is a separate gate; this PR does not equate common-subexpression sharing with complete costing. No automatic merge.