fix(step-generation): if labware is being moved to a stacker allow stacking without a specific stackLimit

[rclarke0]

Overview

Labware definitions without a stackLimit are not currently able to be moved to a stacker hopper. This PR checks if the stacker is in the stack list, and sets isAboveStackLimit to false. This fixes the error if a labware does not have a defined stackLimit in its definition.

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Tested on protocol in ticket EXEC-2206

Review requests

Will this mess up other labware moves?

Risk assessment

medium

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 56.14%. Comparing base (21573f5) to head (fef8998).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on edge.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
step-generation/src/utils/misc.ts	93.75%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge   #20435      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.10%   56.14%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        3669     3669              
  Lines      309400   309605     +205     
  Branches    45921    45952      +31     
==========================================
+ Hits       173586   173823     +237     
+ Misses     135571   135539      -32     
  Partials      243      243              

Flag	Coverage Δ
protocol-designer	19.49% <0.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
step-generation	5.74% <93.75%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
step-generation/src/utils/misc.ts	63.02% <93.75%> (+0.14%)	⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.