-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 475
feat(auth): add a generic OIDC login provider #496
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kooler
wants to merge
2
commits into
Openpanel-dev:main
Choose a base branch
from
kooler:generic-oidc
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
368 changes: 368 additions & 0 deletions
368
apps/api/src/controllers/oauth-callback.controller.test.ts
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,368 @@ | ||
| /** | ||
| * Security properties of the OIDC callback: state and PKCE verifier are both | ||
| * required before a code exchange, an unverified email is refused, and | ||
| * account matching never falls back to email. | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| import type { FastifyReply, FastifyRequest } from 'fastify'; | ||
| import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'; | ||
|
|
||
| const { | ||
| accountFindFirst, | ||
| userCreate, | ||
| userFindFirst, | ||
| createSessionMock, | ||
| setSessionTokenCookieMock, | ||
| validateAuthorizationCodeMock, | ||
| getIsRegistrationAllowedMock, | ||
| cookieOptions, | ||
| } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ | ||
| accountFindFirst: vi.fn(), | ||
| userCreate: vi.fn(), | ||
| userFindFirst: vi.fn(), | ||
| createSessionMock: vi.fn(), | ||
| setSessionTokenCookieMock: vi.fn(), | ||
| validateAuthorizationCodeMock: vi.fn(), | ||
| getIsRegistrationAllowedMock: vi.fn(), | ||
| cookieOptions: { | ||
| domain: undefined, | ||
| secure: false, | ||
| sameSite: 'lax', | ||
| httpOnly: true, | ||
| path: '/', | ||
| }, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| vi.mock('@openpanel/auth', () => ({ | ||
| Arctic: { decodeIdToken: vi.fn() }, | ||
| COOKIE_OPTIONS: cookieOptions, | ||
| createSession: createSessionMock, | ||
| generateSessionToken: () => 'session-token', | ||
| github: {}, | ||
| google: {}, | ||
| oidc: { validateAuthorizationCode: validateAuthorizationCodeMock }, | ||
| oidcConfig: { | ||
| clientId: 'openpanel', | ||
| clientSecret: 'secret', | ||
| redirectUri: 'http://localhost:3333/oauth/oidc/callback', | ||
| authorizationEndpoint: 'http://idp.test/authorize', | ||
| tokenEndpoint: 'http://idp.test/token', | ||
| userinfoEndpoint: 'http://idp.test/userinfo', | ||
| scopes: ['openid', 'profile', 'email'], | ||
| name: 'Keycloak', | ||
| }, | ||
| setLastAuthProviderCookie: vi.fn(), | ||
| setSessionTokenCookie: setSessionTokenCookieMock, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| vi.mock('@openpanel/db', () => ({ | ||
| db: { | ||
| account: { findFirst: accountFindFirst, update: vi.fn() }, | ||
| user: { create: userCreate, findFirst: userFindFirst }, | ||
| }, | ||
| connectUserToOrganization: vi.fn(), | ||
| getIsRegistrationAllowed: getIsRegistrationAllowedMock, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| const { mapOidcUser, oidcCallback } = await import( | ||
| './oauth-callback.controller' | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| function makeReply() { | ||
| const redirect = vi.fn(); | ||
| const clearCookie = vi.fn(); | ||
| const reply = { | ||
| redirect, | ||
| clearCookie, | ||
| setCookie: vi.fn(), | ||
| log: { error: vi.fn() }, | ||
| request: { id: 'req-1' }, | ||
| }; | ||
| return { reply: reply as unknown as FastifyReply, redirect, clearCookie }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function makeReq(cookies: Record<string, string> = {}) { | ||
| return { | ||
| query: { code: 'auth-code', state: 'state-1' }, | ||
| cookies: { | ||
| oidc_oauth_state: 'state-1', | ||
| oidc_code_verifier: 'verifier-1', | ||
| ...cookies, | ||
| }, | ||
| log: { error: vi.fn() }, | ||
| } as unknown as FastifyRequest; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function userInfoResponse(body: unknown) { | ||
| return { | ||
| ok: true, | ||
| json: () => Promise.resolve(body), | ||
| } as unknown as Response; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function stubUserInfo(body: unknown) { | ||
| const fetchMock = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(userInfoResponse(body)); | ||
| vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetchMock); | ||
| return fetchMock; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function redirectedError(redirect: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>) { | ||
| const url = new URL(redirect.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as string); | ||
| return { pathname: url.pathname, error: url.searchParams.get('error') }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| beforeEach(() => { | ||
| vi.clearAllMocks(); | ||
| // Otherwise the fetch stub outlives its test. | ||
| vi.unstubAllGlobals(); | ||
| vi.stubEnv('DASHBOARD_URL', 'http://localhost:3000'); | ||
| validateAuthorizationCodeMock.mockResolvedValue({ | ||
| accessToken: () => 'access-token', | ||
| }); | ||
| getIsRegistrationAllowedMock.mockResolvedValue(true); | ||
| accountFindFirst.mockResolvedValue(null); | ||
| userFindFirst.mockResolvedValue(null); | ||
| userCreate.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'user-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }); | ||
| createSessionMock.mockResolvedValue({ expiresAt: new Date() }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('mapOidcUser', () => { | ||
| it('maps a full userinfo payload', () => { | ||
| expect( | ||
| mapOidcUser({ | ||
| sub: 'sub-1', | ||
| email: 'ada@example.com', | ||
| email_verified: true, | ||
| given_name: 'Ada', | ||
| family_name: 'Lovelace', | ||
| name: 'Ada Lovelace', | ||
| }) | ||
| ).toEqual({ | ||
| id: 'sub-1', | ||
| email: 'ada@example.com', | ||
| firstName: 'Ada', | ||
| lastName: 'Lovelace', | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('falls back from given_name to name to the email local part', () => { | ||
| const base = { sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }; | ||
| expect(mapOidcUser({ ...base, name: 'Ada Lovelace' }).firstName).toBe( | ||
| 'Ada Lovelace' | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(mapOidcUser(base).firstName).toBe('ada'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it.each([ | ||
| ['sub', { email: 'ada@example.com' }], | ||
| ['email', { sub: 'sub-1' }], | ||
| ])('throws when %s is missing', (_claim, payload) => { | ||
| expect(() => mapOidcUser(payload)).toThrow(/userinfo/i); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it.each([false, 'false'])( | ||
| 'rejects email_verified=%o however the provider spells it', | ||
| (claim) => { | ||
| expect(() => | ||
| mapOidcUser({ | ||
| sub: 'sub-1', | ||
| email: 'ada@example.com', | ||
| email_verified: claim, | ||
| }) | ||
| ).toThrow(/verified/i); | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| it.each([true, 'true'])( | ||
| 'accepts email_verified=%o however the provider spells it', | ||
| (claim) => { | ||
| // Cognito sends this claim as a string. | ||
| expect( | ||
| mapOidcUser({ | ||
| sub: 'sub-1', | ||
| email: 'ada@example.com', | ||
| email_verified: claim, | ||
| }).id | ||
| ).toBe('sub-1'); | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| it('treats an unrecognised email_verified value as absent', () => { | ||
| expect( | ||
| mapOidcUser({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com', email_verified: 2 }) | ||
| .id | ||
| ).toBe('sub-1'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('accepts a payload with no email_verified claim', () => { | ||
| expect( | ||
| mapOidcUser({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }).id | ||
| ).toBe('sub-1'); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('oidcCallback', () => { | ||
| it('refuses a state that does not match the cookie', async () => { | ||
| const { reply, redirect } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq({ oidc_oauth_state: 'other-state' }), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(validateAuthorizationCodeMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(createSessionMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(setSessionTokenCookieMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(redirectedError(redirect)).toEqual({ | ||
| pathname: '/login', | ||
| error: 'OAuth state mismatch', | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('refuses a callback with no PKCE verifier cookie', async () => { | ||
| const { reply, redirect } = makeReply(); | ||
| const req = makeReq(); | ||
| (req.cookies as Record<string, string | undefined>).oidc_code_verifier = | ||
| undefined; | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(req, reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(validateAuthorizationCodeMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(setSessionTokenCookieMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(redirectedError(redirect).pathname).toBe('/login'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('creates no user when the provider reports an unverified email', async () => { | ||
| vi.stubGlobal( | ||
| 'fetch', | ||
| vi.fn().mockResolvedValue( | ||
| userInfoResponse({ | ||
| sub: 'sub-1', | ||
| email: 'ada@example.com', | ||
| email_verified: false, | ||
| }) | ||
| ) | ||
| ); | ||
| const { reply, redirect } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(userCreate).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(setSessionTokenCookieMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(redirectedError(redirect).error).toMatch(/verified/i); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('matches on provider and subject only, never on email', async () => { | ||
| vi.stubGlobal( | ||
| 'fetch', | ||
| vi | ||
| .fn() | ||
| .mockResolvedValue( | ||
| userInfoResponse({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }) | ||
| ) | ||
| ); | ||
| const { reply } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(accountFindFirst).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
| expect(accountFindFirst).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ | ||
| where: { provider: 'oidc', providerId: 'sub-1' }, | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(JSON.stringify(accountFindFirst.mock.calls[0])).not.toContain( | ||
| 'ada@example.com' | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('sends the access token to the userinfo endpoint as a bearer token', async () => { | ||
| const fetchMock = vi | ||
| .fn() | ||
| .mockResolvedValue( | ||
| userInfoResponse({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }) | ||
| ); | ||
| vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetchMock); | ||
| const { reply } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(validateAuthorizationCodeMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith( | ||
| 'http://idp.test/token', | ||
| 'auth-code', | ||
| 'verifier-1' | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(fetchMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith( | ||
| 'http://idp.test/userinfo', | ||
| expect.objectContaining({ | ||
| headers: expect.objectContaining({ | ||
| Authorization: 'Bearer access-token', | ||
| }), | ||
| }) | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('creates the user, the session and the session cookie for a new subject', async () => { | ||
| stubUserInfo({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }); | ||
| const { reply, redirect } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(userCreate).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| email: 'ada@example.com', | ||
| firstName: 'ada', | ||
| lastName: '', | ||
| accounts: { create: { provider: 'oidc', providerId: 'sub-1' } }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(createSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('session-token', 'user-1'); | ||
| expect(setSessionTokenCookieMock).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(redirect).toHaveBeenCalledWith('http://localhost:3000'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('signs a known subject in without creating a second user', async () => { | ||
| accountFindFirst.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'account-1', userId: 'user-9' }); | ||
| stubUserInfo({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }); | ||
| const { reply, redirect } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(userCreate).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(createSessionMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('session-token', 'user-9'); | ||
| expect(setSessionTokenCookieMock).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(redirect).toHaveBeenCalledWith('http://localhost:3000'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('refuses a new subject whose email already belongs to another login method', async () => { | ||
| userFindFirst.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'user-9', email: 'ada@example.com' }); | ||
| stubUserInfo({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }); | ||
| const { reply, redirect } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(userCreate).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(setSessionTokenCookieMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(redirectedError(redirect).error).toMatch(/original authentication/i); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('creates no user when registration is closed', async () => { | ||
| getIsRegistrationAllowedMock.mockResolvedValue(false); | ||
| stubUserInfo({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }); | ||
| const { reply, redirect } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(userCreate).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(setSessionTokenCookieMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(redirectedError(redirect).error).toMatch(/not allowed/i); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('clears the state and verifier cookies with the options they were set with', async () => { | ||
| stubUserInfo({ sub: 'sub-1', email: 'ada@example.com' }); | ||
| const { reply, clearCookie } = makeReply(); | ||
|
|
||
| await oidcCallback(makeReq(), reply); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(clearCookie).toHaveBeenCalledWith( | ||
| 'oidc_code_verifier', | ||
| cookieOptions | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(clearCookie).toHaveBeenCalledWith('oidc_oauth_state', cookieOptions); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.