Repository navigation
fix(multipart): resume interrupted uploads without file hashes - #3332
Open
thetapilla wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
thetapilla wants to merge 2 commits into
thetapilla wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
- A receiving session could only be resumed when the client sent file hashes, and the web client only computes them when rapid upload is requested. By default a reload therefore superseded the session and restarted the upload from scratch. - Accept an optional X-File-Identity header on init: an opaque client fingerprint (at most 256 bytes) stored with the session. When either side has one, a receiving session resumes only if both are equal and no hash sent on both inits differs; otherwise the existing hash rule applies unchanged. - Add TestResumeReceivingByIdentity covering eight identity/hash combinations. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
… file - With Overwrite off, init answered "file exists" before deciding whether to resume. In-place drivers such as Local write the destination from the first chunk on, so after a reload the upload's own partial output blocked its resume, and the Retry button failed the same way. - Skip the check when the re-init would resume a session and its identity or hashes prove it is the same file: what sits at the destination then belongs to that upload. - Picking up a failed attempt is no proof on its own, since any init for the same path and size does that, so a different file is still refused. - Add TestResumesSameFile. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
thetapilla
force-pushed
the
fix/multipart-file-identity
branch
from
October 31, 2026 08:19
2950ba1 to
1211d4e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary / 摘要
让分块上传在不勾"尝试秒传"时也能断点续传,并修复原地写入的驱动上续传和"重试"被这次上传自己的半成品挡住的问题。
用户可感知的变化:
file exists实现要点:
POST /fs/multipart/init新增可选请求头X-File-Identity,是客户端生成的文件指纹。服务端不解析、只比对,最长 256 字节(超过返回 400),随会话保存。任一方带了指纹时,双方指纹相同、且两次 init 都带的同种哈希不冲突,才续传;都不带指纹时沿用原有的哈希规则file exists检查。目标位置上的文件这时属于这次上传:要么是原地写入的驱动写下的半成品,要么是它开始时就允许替换的文件。只续上一个失败的尝试不算证明,同路径、同大小的任何 init 都会续上它,所以换了文件照常拒绝兼容性说明:新增一个可选请求头,不发这个头的客户端,续传规则不变。会话仍按用户隔离、按路径和大小定位,指纹只决定是否续传用户自己的会话,不是安全边界。
/ 此 PR 包含破坏性变更。
/ 此 PR 修改了公开 API、配置、存储格式或迁移行为。
/ 此 PR 需要关联仓库同步修改。
Related repository PRs / 关联仓库 PR:
Related Issues / 关联 Issue
Relates to #3178
Testing / 测试
测试平台:macOS arm64,Go 1.27.3。
go test ./...自动化测试:
go test -race -count=1 ./internal/multipart/ ./server/handles/file exists;勾覆盖开始的上传,刷新后不勾覆盖也能续传同一文件。其中哈希冲突、长度上限、越过半成品这三项,都先在修复前的服务端上确认会失败浏览器实测:
resumed,只补传剩余分片,内容一致Checklist / 检查清单
/ 我已阅读 CONTRIBUTING。
/ 我确认此贡献符合仓库许可证、贡献规范和行为准则。
gofmt,go fmt, orprettierwhere applicable./ 我已按适用情况使用
gofmt、go fmt或prettier格式化变更代码。/ 我已在适用情况下请求相关维护者或代码所有者审查。
AI Disclosure / AI 使用声明
/ 此 PR 包含 AI 辅助内容。
Tools used / 使用工具:
Usage scope / 使用范围:
Code generation / 代码生成
Refactoring / 重构
Documentation / 文档
Tests / 测试
Translation / 翻译
Review assistance / 审查辅助
I have reviewed and validated all AI-assisted content included in this PR.
/ 我已审核并验证此 PR 中的所有 AI 辅助内容。
I have ensured that all AI-assisted commits include
Co-Authored-Byattribution./ 我已确保所有 AI 辅助提交都包含
Co-Authored-By归属信息。I can reproduce all AI-assisted content included in this PR without any AI tools.
/ 我可以在没有任何 AI 工具的情况下重现此 PR 中包含的所有 AI 辅助内容。